Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll
Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com> Wed, 29 January 2014 14:06 UTC
Return-Path: <agouaillard@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173FF1A03CB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:06:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4W0Ud3W5nlOH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22a.google.com (mail-oa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7A31A03BF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:05:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i7so2071479oag.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:05:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Fnw1JXvPQWbPPNPpQeeyIgfKJoldQTLOuFlrpVhrjlM=; b=ZuraD0aaqhlh4QdhY5XAOMeqXgm9rRheX1Bb3vMrkPHrFUjHsUcr48WPOvvkvCAAOb J9BMQ2z3NqmyhdYlQfymmjcPJtT7x4DkhomoCZHZ7KszOVUnscfwRpINNfYUadwb73lw kjJiEUXaU0JyDg0K46EM+bfQJ9kZGeCXnMNGnQljj0mr9Yl0yzqFxvSfLTLTU3BYAkLr bTWObFdoQ0+bA2Lj0e63aJRdu2ko9u8OrruSKcTsdBeBFn7MRkmdPEv3f6oFebtyd6wj clzQuBqWRCOfGldrm/Iou+eMFaFmTSLIo0ZGv19VK1OSSthUtcrMP7QF4V0lDK8w1Y/k /mXw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.223.114 with SMTP id qt18mr1329800obc.61.1391004348887; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:05:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.183.6.227 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:05:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CF0EAA42.3DC7A%ode@tid.es>
References: <BFDBDCA9-937E-4B90-97B1-A23EEB65CF9A@iii.ca> <CF0EAA42.3DC7A%ode@tid.es>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:05:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHgZEq7RMUu-uHNQE6vJmjcVybbYtqU4vozUka=MzE+4M9uHdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
To: OSCAR DIVORRA ESCODA <ode@tid.es>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d044280c018b84204f11c702b"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:06:00 -0000
+1 On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:56 AM, OSCAR DIVORRA ESCODA <ode@tid.es> wrote: > +1 > > > Òscar > > > On 28/01/14 6.13, "Cullen Jennings" <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote: > > > > >Dear WG, > > > >After reviewing the poll results found here: > >http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/pdfWd2PIhOY9y.pdf the > >chairs concludes that the working group still believes that an MTI is > >required for the WebRTC ecology to develop. There are a number of > >options which did not garner significant support; essentially only > >options 1, 2, 3, 4 seem to have enough support that they might be the > >eventual basis of working group consensus. The chairs do not view the > >other options as having sufficient support to warrant further working > >group activity or discussion. > > > >There is no obvious leader between VP8 and H.264, however, nor obvious > >support for selecting both. Each has similar numbers of supporting > >positions and objections, and both have the support of well over half the > >participants in the straw poll. Given that, we are no closer to being > >able to choose between them at this time. > > > >The chairs therefore propose tabling the discussion of a mandatory to > >implement video codec until about 6 week before the start of the IETF 91 > >meeting in November 2014. This is so that the working group can focus its > >energy on completing other work. We do expect to begin work on the video > >document (draft-ietf-rtcweb-video) to meet its milestone of December, but > >initially without specifying which of the two codecs is the WG consensus > >for MTI. > > > >When we return to the discussion, the working group chairs currently > >expect to run a consensus call on support for each codec to be mandatory > >to implement. This expectation may change, however, based on new > >information or working group experience. > > > >If anyone has concerns about tabling this discussion until September 29, > >2014 please let us know by February 4. > > > >Thank you, > > > >Cullen, Magnus, Ted <the chairs> > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >rtcweb mailing list > >rtcweb@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace > situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > -- Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CTO - Temasys Communications, S'pore / Mountain View President - CoSMo Software, Cambridge, MA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard -
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Chenxin (Xin)
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Stefan Håkansson LK
- [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Victor Pascual Avila
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw pol Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll OSCAR DIVORRA ESCODA
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Hervé W.
- Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs and the staw poll Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)