IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Thu, 27 September 2018 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A5F129C6A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i38oSiH1qZjD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5386F130DD6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id l7-v6so3082906iok.6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wu9JpiV246HndEbMCaaRhBTvEO0WjCyj9J6625+ZRck=; b=u7frNTk+qvoixEFfTm+sYS9iqYeQTW2CYjc51AWvQMosf4W+scSMQUIN5hzGdMcoXB x7tjMKtMv6IBrWdi7WsqYhcFuFfcUVCSLcdwkYc2BrFnIzIytOclWPrJDYaodKBCh49w CrutLAQNoyZ3rfpbD62Sf2yWDugPBSqU5ff2WIlI8OSQG38TzTgd4PPQey9l88bfzLTb u9sHJPe26imyPpR3t18EOGwZ+JIxbX+RlEYCzikdPe2FJ+bZi7Zh5T3eXUsxWkSKfqvi zMF0vha/XSSDR9a32OG2VTj8JkA6ujkD7uB/udC4zMPDckT5A8Kt57Qr9r+CgLsETwIs fPVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wu9JpiV246HndEbMCaaRhBTvEO0WjCyj9J6625+ZRck=; b=igANDjoQB77mw6XYzgl20WznZrW+qq3h48sF6ciREl/q9DM8v64vTFNdLBGXHn8xAw pLMqG/pRSMJmqVtAzhDqQqs9PnSWbMWZlzjIwNx5ox/N5lQOsY9dNCwDmQVo+RT0wPJW BGJrXuJQs2N/sSMyyy2zPLTHVuEXl0xMvkehl+S3sEQNtRIEMILb9QhXEYxHkcomQupt kcqxTfn57c9NP6Gz61BNLqOyogZa8JhrIRF/nj6RYsZ3SZ8S9wKb8tZxCx+h8zexhgen Sa5ox3Yr9hg1tr7yTpGQfx5vz1Zj3piRW/pjKFdZjklluhnrtxv7NWhtkRh+kE+djsFK SKzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojziccYQpOODg2wPqHG9M9Bv4OSAYVflKyhRKEfkNGiF63wSaBE 1JeIV+IqU4rcI7ZDe6juzdcuLiRLv612JfzWI8GzJA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61nCk6Wukv4aJVFOgwcP9QN6dzM/YKnm7O2FXH3GTc/zEuYq7p9hOTzSl2aT7GyUx5agIjVywadbazpLCRc/Jg=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:9809:: with SMTP id s9-v6mr9987791ioj.87.1538089824230; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOW+2dtkNjzS0DkD37SD=POtC2Nd6Xe=upyjvVoyBnnMw7qwbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANN+akb1S=eJNhSOT-e6R1yn_u20nuZNwDFEK7S90ksJ3wt95A@mail.gmail.com> <b890dedd-9f32-890f-3719-5c0c8ffa8345@gmail.com> <CANN+akZtT7dtcCLgLW9AQy+ZFuDHXxJFNxikPGBQCf7Duy0sug@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANN+akZtT7dtcCLgLW9AQy+ZFuDHXxJFNxikPGBQCf7Duy0sug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:10:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0qTc-Qig_39fNhQiz=LV69MPDVC=jskeBVXoz=ANa2vw@mail.gmail.com>
To: youenn fablet <youennf@gmail.com>
Cc: Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009bcd210576e271bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/rNTpE2u_livtfaHqzBJZ4tqafvs>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 23:10:27 -0000

I suggest that we hold off on assessing what this might mean for data
channel and related applications until we have data from browsers showing
the actual connectivity/traffic impact of mDNS.

We should have initial data on this topic from Chrome by EOY.

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:14 PM youenn fablet <youennf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>> Perhaps its feasible for those use cases where the administrator is
>> already aware of the software but definitely not for small applications
>> such as sharedrop.io, Threema Web whose main use case is the direct
>> connection in same network environments and its significant benefits
>> regarding throughput.
>>
>
> I agree this is the most likely scenario where host candidates are
> actually useful: two web browsers doing pure data channel on a
> managed/complex network, and no coordination between the network admin
> being and the app.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email