IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Sat, 20 July 2013 01:52 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4440411E81CD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.329
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.329 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.270, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zt8iZ-eLk1up for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA3211E8191 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc-vpn5-843.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9139022E1F4; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:52:44 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUFmODfuLvaPJL8niP480fp0BwPBX7nYpQARRAogHOc7uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:52:54 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1CFEEBBF-DD98-4EDA-9595-F4E3ACB8A94F@iii.ca>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHOZf21aXgQMrdjTV8Fok+fVp-2SuhTra0JGy0Jq=Wi0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2mNdNiXCCNUdEvKgAsh_pPn=jNs+56VCg4PMKbUmOGztQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUZMAuDocwZWXn9a+Xj3kkcX0uyRgjDmy-hQxpTDKWj3w@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CF49@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmiRsOXL97XDzMRQ_Vvbk9zaDBBvCPxr_=zbDJbnMZ_8A@mail.gmail.com> <E795F35A-B0A5-4BD8-B807-C97B76EC586B@iii.ca> <CAJrXDUHi3Rs4ioWqX4-ACF4crfDJT5Z71pvzzQvW_HqGqUH0VQ@mail.gmail.com> <0D2B47D9-25BF-40C1-AC41-DF65093A6B94@iii.ca > <CAJrXDUFmODfuLvaPJL8niP480fp0BwPBX7nYpQARRAogHOc7uQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 01:52:51 -0000

On Jul 19, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:

> You're surprised that the first web developers that try out WebRTC and have feedback have experience with SIP and VoIP?  We shouldn't find that surprising, nor should we discount their feedback because of it.

I was not saying that feedback from folks like Bernard Aboba was not useful, of course it can be. I was just noting the sample set.

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status