Re: [rtcweb] Where Plan A, B, and "no plan" discussions should happen

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E35321F9339 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.349, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UWqPhXL3aiyM for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc2-s2.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s2.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C955721F96B1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W2 ([65.55.111.72]) by blu0-omc2-s2.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:02:02 -0700
X-TMN: [S4cgEsN1qNv4PUqUL0Bo7n14TzpG6eJg]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU169-W2A1A541B0EFEBB9A417AB93990@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_db7b5705-a12b-468c-adfb-213ae4d2d8ce_"
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:02:01 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMA-sye-uss+xa1kHkcGu7Yaw9QdgioHq2kj2a76RfQgCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMA-sye-uss+xa1kHkcGu7Yaw9QdgioHq2kj2a76RfQgCQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2013 19:02:02.0136 (UTC) FILETIME=[7E66F180:01CE63B1]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Where Plan A, B, and "no plan" discussions should happen
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:02:12 -0000

Ted said: 

At this point, I do not see consensus to withdraw the request to MMUSIC from RTCWEB, 
 
[BA] Given the number of messages posted about "the plans" there is clearly some SDP guidance needed, and MMUSIC is the WG that would provide that.  So letting the request to MMUSIC go forward makes sense to me.