Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory codec on condition?

Otto J Wittner <otto.wittner@uninett.no> Thu, 29 March 2012 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <otto.wittner@uninett.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E49521F898F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.025
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.025 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.575, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bTxwmMynMqhd for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from epost.uninett.no (epost.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:0:526:158:38:180:100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0634221F898B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from khuzdul.uninett.no (khuzdul.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:0:21e:4fff:feed:f70]) by epost.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E91773364B7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:33:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4F744884.8070406@uninett.no>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:33:24 +0200
From: Otto J Wittner <otto.wittner@uninett.no>
Organization: UNINETT AS
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <4F7431FA.5050202@uninett.no> <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC09804BC6EEA6E@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com>
In-Reply-To: <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC09804BC6EEA6E@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory codec on condition?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:33:30 -0000

Two of each if necessary.

O2

On 03/29/2012 01:08 PM, Avasarala, Ranjit wrote:
> By two codecs you mean 1 audio codec and 1 video codec or 2 audio and 2 video codecs?
> 
> Regards
> Ranjit
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Otto J Wittner
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:27 PM
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] Mandatory codec on condition?
> 
> This might be a totally ridiculous suggestion, but I give it a shot anyway.
> 
> Is there any way that two codecs could be specified as mandatory:
>  - one unconditionally mandatory because it is guaranteed royalty free (e.g. h261)
>  - one conditionally mandatory, that is mandatory as long as it stays royalty free (e.g. VP8).
> 
> I'm unsure if "conditionally manadatory" really makes sense, I admit.
> 

-- 
Otto J Wittner   Tel 73557945
UNINETT AS       Mob 99550566