[rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives)

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 09 December 2013 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677DC1AE3FA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:55:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bHo2Fbt83Ips for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:55:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237561AE02F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:55:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB9Ht2T4006244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:55:05 -0800
Message-ID: <52A603B8.3090904@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:54:00 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:55:05 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 17:55:17 -0000

On 12/9/2013 9:24 AM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> The first question is “Are you in favor of this option
> [Yes/No/Acceptable]:”. These three levels allow you to indicate that
> you: Yes= I would be fine with the WG choosing this option. No = I
> really don’t favor this, and it should not be picked. Acceptable = I can
> live with this option but I prefer something else to be picked


Survey methodology remains trickier than anyone would like:  The set of 
choices is unbalanced.

In effect, two of the three choices say that a choice is ok and only one 
says it isn't.  You also need a 'don't care' choice.

Given the intent of 'acceptable', what you need is something like:

    Yes
    Prefer yes
    Don't care
    Prefer no
    No

The first and last indicate simple, direct views, without indicating 
feelings about alternatives.  They might imply "yes means only this is 
acceptable" and no means can't live with this choice", but that probably 
doesn't have to be made explicit.

The second and fourth add those preferences for and against alternatives.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net