IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Transports questions on IPv6

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225E51A020B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ov5FnKH6zvLA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8514B1A01DD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id x13so1731236wgg.26 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:33:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0Cl3EwBZ/yM83Tle0fjxDxQ7oOoOvt4r7GH1/WUugbQ=; b=q6pIJj7xQFtck8/umt814KTwWW4bOsm/PsHFHp3kxw9MC1AUOueg4DN+7HIw5U0umL 90H26rNbi2OU567K5meqc4teCI3HvCq4nGwYMX5ok/nd7P8KEfG0pJoKSFN6zRsgGqGS KyB0qXk1KO2Xu7N1pAT1mOqodh9YhkgYMkhkixI76RD1GgxQOC93vHuzuP4aktoiyAKu LyQl2OQlYjRo5wE3kVZRrfxWYPhJ7MNB8u+LznqXivKgfLQ6VsuA3XKQ7xN10xu+sjhc hCHgFQdMm/fa8QyzJvQhEmDCH37XCz5HY8TuWlxU1gA+EoZ5IbgoVQA7pdjzhTfSGnpw 6wiA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.174.197 with SMTP id bu5mr3077645wjc.71.1394044392535; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.10.196 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-0SuHwrp4L1buF==6hsFd_uwY786DFeRLeP-bcEykGqyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOJ7v-3vukxXzUN5ttEnJ0dTu2YX=N7qdPDqzy8iXaRwMuH7eQ@mail.gmail.com> <5317490E.3090701@viagenie.ca> <CAOJ7v-0SuHwrp4L1buF==6hsFd_uwY786DFeRLeP-bcEykGqyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:33:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX5XvTaiNuLNaqK_+APZmdq-L4NgBKUhbdbxwHqp9ViBA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/s3h7OYHglsB0k5zmMwamQuHZpN4
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Transports questions on IPv6
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:33:26 -0000

On 5 March 2014 18:16, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
> I worked this through and I think ICE will choose (b), due to the (G>D?1:0)
> tiebreaker, which seems right to me. So no action needed :)

Isn't it the case that you can assign different local priorities to
these to get the result that you need/want such that the tie breaker
is not necessary.  I would suggest that ICE would prefer the
v6-all-the-way option, but the happy eyeballs stuff might cause the
precedence to flip.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email