Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Wed, 18 April 2018 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0600C126DFB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rWHM9UxiR6F0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com (mail-qt0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14F8212DA42 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f20-v6so3188638qtp.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Mm7GnRMia6FfXd/VOTyLLOmlVUy59yeN8iL3driZsho=; b=XdEOnTcECOXHNf/SfbXTx6879mZSOpDO/YxP6TUoqO1DJPl7dCu4PIlZHGac0SVbLP XTFqHspzLIA7GNU6j3yxNM9/CQllG6yc83F7iynxe+afMM88OxvBI58H8OSIZDwBxYKs U3OZLTsWxqm00gmosh/APr4Csm3v6Hy/CYYn0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Mm7GnRMia6FfXd/VOTyLLOmlVUy59yeN8iL3driZsho=; b=FJn4pwpXwqbz3C0yyEWmGFs35Aj3EjVATR08aWuzdceLbh2fR+q4abaU4DZ5diqRNj io7MlppRVSLnK0ctP6lFuTYJUgkqA7kOhmylM1XWcIgwP9fz3qUQCgTYaCXMxfnco/BF 2Gxg37L/cGsLjJ/Uhj2BC2Utwo9WIK1pv2THtejq2BShXb9s12lJQIlJZYs1hJw2INDH +UwgX2QZ6UmczuPuiiX42yA3ezeO6YmYWuNiq23+rdhSOK6HZKp9YPw1Q+v9W4D0zyew h+ZSDkIzo67Pa4tHp3sD6yKEB4ygrz8k7v2M7IThPUzzE+eLs6rOUs0TRFZh4/xKL2iZ 2CTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCTZgaLvQv6e5+BisdyODnAkPISQjUfpYgYPZGaBRznUBGhKKWQ F6Ca5Ga9l9KG8OfIWhwrJhlIZQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZos+eXBbNjxkgoRDA/zNGt0xFj3SsRnrbnqkjwficGsTnnh4qPlXS0ls781UgtVevSoJWEFcg==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:21a7:: with SMTP id l36-v6mr3347450qtc.265.1524082806060; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.18] ([96.231.225.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a28sm1522698qkj.28.2018.04.18.13.20.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-1sHcm46BCttHMNA4gjUTL98RwBRm-H1HGpF7Bwx2ceGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:20:03 -0400
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <03257894-7D79-463D-BC3A-5B388680A3E7@sn3rd.com>
References: <1D5B431C-801E-4F8C-8026-6BCBB72FF478@sn3rd.com> <63282b84-4493-3fcb-a95f-4afe17d96bb6@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOJ7v-1gTq+EEjb+-q-T-pABBW--rpNGegoj_d2_7f7AKGksCA@mail.gmail.com> <403713b4-31d4-9085-d639-d3f60935ed5a@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOJ7v-0ED-FK=JmSxBJYfM=PCdgY6kmbiq6aFLcP7OXugG07EA@mail.gmail.com> <e6938f7d-542d-736b-0a3d-9269d7dd06e5@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOW+2dv1ORz2tEkgDTvdM1DtgyOdgXqKU30T4QhLAp1NT+rirg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0tCcg3FdzyfSJ6Y3JaH-TivFf-Sey6+tD8BANJKsjqtQ@mail.gmail.com> <1fceb3c4-35f3-34f7-de1d-79d5805e6d22@gmail.com> <9517D601-D3E8-46E1-94E5-7EC29FD6319B@sn3rd.com> <b5d323ac-2205-2aee-05c9-f270e80215f5@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0+hr-NddbLCwgjkfyEFEzoLYW8BcE5OYZ+HUiqDRnarg@mail.gmail.com> <0dee004d-159a-a9be-a0b8-ecbfd4204d72@gmail.com> <06252a76-f12e-4d8d-4a07-5240a7605bce@gmail.com> <914e0220-e3cc-00d7-0925-e5deb8b07e75@nostrum.com> <AFDFD3F3-4798-4716-B26C-A67457BF2C65@sn3rd.com> <e5e2a517-d29a-117c-ab79-6f01fa62b843@gmail.com> <20180412144158.44733ac7@lminiero> <b767da79-7678-2a1c-ecb0-46a9a3bd9129@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2gmxpsGp=25pcJmnkYmipZdCFOqU4nLtAVSznLsZo9rQ@mail.gmail.com> <4902F7BF-0D20-4EA6-9E78-D22C90EFCE22@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-3NsqD6pq-kkMw81+2n_D8qf558CKeCE76ZypyxwCgs9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2NJ1vhVUerZ1cn8MP9hD_vgAYBurjeQKMx76Aa_U=n=Q@mail.gmail.com> <A8B32C11-30BD-4DA8-9BAB-FA26747BFF66@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-0VNCjGdhtz56jwwksBcfPk=9wuxfMgwi8mq7ViFyWpuw@mail.gmail.com> <DDEE408B-B49E-465E-B17B-C2813AF4F2F4@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-26f1hrujtegK6_U50E0MZPy5zmf0yDUWBY5oqrKQmGQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2fn-SdR2VUbVVHbMB-_Rw9gV0nsRnc2Ace+682LBJBag@mail.gmail.com> <7E9CBD87-6C00-4CF8-AEDE-D2AEFC3213FA@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-1sHcm46BCttHMNA4gjUTL98RwBRm-H1HGpF7Bwx2ceGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/s9HN4QmeG_RFM9L8rNVqH7pESD0>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:20:14 -0000

Yes please.  I think the IETF LC should be on the latest text.

Note I’ve already updated the Shepherd write-up as Stephen suggested.

spt

> On Apr 18, 2018, at 03:16, Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> OK, merged b) via https://github.com/juberti/draughts/pull/98.
> 
> Sean, should I produce a new version of the document?
> 
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:40 AM westhawk <thp@westhawk.co..uk> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 16 Apr 2018, at 23:06, Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Here's a specific and minimal proposal, which is a slight modification of Sean's proposal in https://github.com/juberti/draughts/pull/98/files:
>> 
>> The details of this consent are left to the implementation; one potential mechanism is to tie this consent to getUserMedia consent. Alternatively implementations can provide a specific mechanism to obtain user consent where needed, e.g., when a VPN is in use.
>> 
>> b) Sean's proposal (without the boldface)
> 
> b)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb