IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Sat, 08 June 2013 04:55 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F61A21F9A0D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 21:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jaiwIIfiSB36 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 21:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AE821F9A0B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 21:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.70.232.148] (unknown [64.104.46.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CAE122E253; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 00:55:27 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <51B0538A.5040800@jitsi.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 11:55:25 +0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <13E7B858-B8F0-45D9-A7AA-E265A552EE3E@iii.ca>
References: <51A65017.4090502@jitsi.org> <C3639EB3-0F44-4893-88DA-BB9F9C96A116@iii.ca> <51A8EB7F.6000506@jitsi.org> <72B58042-78E3-4759-B3CD-204B82A38447@iii.ca> <51ACF998.5030202@jitsi.org> <CALiegf=pJtdL2A6V7bprZ_F=V39Fadb+kRw3yfO+6+MFVZ9x2A@mail.gmail.com> <5ED2CC48-1514-4C00-AEE8-A334EB67A6F4@iii.ca> <51AF5784.3060307@jitsi.org> <13444A29-86C6-4D69-964D-AE9A5BA7BB4A@iii.ca> <51B0538A.5040800@jitsi.org>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org, "rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 04:55:37 -0000

On Jun 6, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:

> P.S. I am confused as to where this discussion should be happening. There have been contradictory comments from chairs that seem to say how this should be in MMUSIC and how it actually doesn't belong to MMUSIC and should happen on RTCWEB. I'd be grateful if chairs of both WGs could sort this out and provide guidance.

Given my participation in this conversation as an individual contributor, I'm a little hesitant to try and answer this from a chair role but let me try and help…

I think (or at least hope) the chairs have been pretty clear that the Plan A vs Plan B conversation about how SDP is used to represent multiple things should be in MMusic. It's not clear to me if this is part of that discussion or not. A question like "Should WebRTC use SDP" is clearly not in MMusic WG while a question like "how to we extend SDP to do X" is typically in MMUSIC. 

Hope that helps and I CC'd the other chairs in case they want to add anything.

Cullen <with my rtcweb chair hat on>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email