IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A2A21F9D7B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CXhgB7+lKxUi for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com [62.134.46.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB11821F9E7D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MCHP01HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.234]) by senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (Server) with ESMTP id D9E4D1EB85A9; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:52:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.1.174]) by MCHP01HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.234]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:52:01 +0200
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
Thread-Index: AQHObmjByY7ZqkO+CkSPIPqSfmn6rpk/9zkggAA7qICAAC+Z2w==
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:52:00 +0000
Message-ID: <4337C1D6-5D1E-4316-A96B-E6FBA2E647E7@siemens-enterprise.com>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHCkQSLab2UuY_vWP3Gr8uh+++c9mDq5f4sCpuaK5aeLQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C1B907.8060508@hookflash.com> <CAJrXDUG06jvPvhfNwZ6Puzxj7E4XxELG_fU=S7B_c=tnC9eoNQ@mail.gmail.com> <78192824-A516-4376-8D4F-3B052ED47A0C@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUGOYc_Z_qWD7J0ZzVdfwYOacH_p5PjZEg5aP1LUetffMA@mail.gmail.com> <51C1F2E9.20405@hookflash.com> <51C1F5ED.9090308@matthew.at> <51C20FAA.4050701@hookflash.com> <CABkgnnWw9anT+h_hnF14nBChS73qpTb31hSM=p2KnGrcRPGRJA@mail.gmail.com> <51C3209B.1030501@alvestrand.no> <CALiegfkEpwxNZL8TU0ofCzRB_Gza+NoSnZpGcM=tuYBOXmHsZQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C335F9.4000900@alvestrand.no> <CALiegfk_wwvdSixFYWpBBdUNfXxmcOwCnRsjyS6J3M9WG_dJCg@mail.gmail.com> <51C38356.3020402@jitsi.org> <CALiegfm1xYpAnmrg=4vx_06RZQTo_RS2nFJoidpoQtjg2kn=Vw@mail.gmail.com> <1371807600.23131.YahooMailNeo@web171301.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <CALiegfmPV=E2qh_E-v_eBiSj9iK7Un2JLDtELF7xnYARHy5B3g@mail.gmail.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF115D4A59@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>, <CAD5OKxtYeDP-O_YfT3G=+mHPfPKAthJVuoYtNaa3R97yFU-ZoA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxtYeDP-O_YfT3G=+mHPfPKAthJVuoYtNaa3R97yFU-ZoA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4337C1D65D1E4316A96BE6FBA2E647E7siemensenterprisecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "diopmamadou@doubango.org" <diopmamadou@doubango.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:52:12 -0000

Now this is getting ridiculous.

You do know that one of the goals is to build an API that web developers without knowledge of IETF protocols can use to build apps. I was only using this as an example where this has been achieved.

I also think you know that there are many apps out there already which are much more than high school projects.

I believe we are simply making life difficult by trying to do too much at once  and we need to rethink what is really needed and deliver on what we have said we we will deliver please read the charter.

Andy





On 21 Jun 2013, at 17:01, "Roman Shpount" <roman@telurix.com<mailto:roman@telurix.com>> wrote:


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com<mailto:andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>> wrote:

Which means we have not been as unsuccessful as people seem to think.

If building a demo or a high school home work is your goal, then yes. If you want the commercial product then no. I am not sure if you are familiar with 80/20 rule, but normally 20% of features require 80% of time to implement. In case of WebRTC it is 20% of features require 99% to implement. In other words, you get something working quick, but getting it to complete product take an inordinate amount of work.
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email