Re: [rtcweb] Target numbers for setup time (Re: Keeping up data channel)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 05 July 2012 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FCC11E80B3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ftd6BsIsCRga for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBE211E80AA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty7 with SMTP id y7so848771bkt.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AH0/RErQ4PeIqzCV0bmMAEEBraSmjxAzNCyPIjTcGoM=; b=mybuMhozBmJkKUZrtGA0pyLiVS+Fa2feYQ9XnBUeXXBf9GxetzYvU452KJHZfx4hwl HRbT1+dPlcREQlqAEqHGB5SSq4Nxr7AiGAxPKARlAUg8CAaAKxlywWfaih+FJVmvW+HL 3W3azs4z+9Cq6bnh856ALmTEFqUTk0eTxXFvlEI0M5JGn+gd5BJ1yVRmHpeVwVgPeBOS 613m0fhZjK2ixqsh9n4iTi+OIPTyJSLsKLErxiu5AcsG3nTG23ZSchkJXpPstu4jpen9 R6YJ7Z78mmnscxnUVSySXtLxAmsgGvWP7VPQad6L8VMEIs8ZS/xYdfyIZ9IAH+Vk5Pvv vt5Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.152.206 with SMTP id h14mr10727222bkw.36.1341525011492; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.66.4 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <047E39EB-F92F-44EA-B44F-03ADE49E0BEC@iii.ca>
References: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB76223EA5F@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com> <4FD6D566.6060806@alvestrand.no> <4FD7A356.2010406@ericsson.com> <CABkgnnV7DLFsT9A=5UG_XsPcNpJY39Xan1sEoMRfmN7oJSWuVA@mail.gmail.com> <4FD83C21.4080701@alvestrand.no> <4FD85D78.1040103@jesup.org> <929BD935-0E8F-4985-9E51-9E213B0C6841@cisco.com> <4FE4A6B2.7020601@alvestrand.no> <8F1A4041-E7E8-49D4-A77B-EDFF1F5A617C@cisco.com> <4FEEF614.6090507@jesup.org> <CAOJ7v-3W6fntUop+66SjhicuDzDnKJ-Kadxg1frp2QwiZhV=tA@mail.gmail.com> <047E39EB-F92F-44EA-B44F-03ADE49E0BEC@iii.ca>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:50:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWjaa2mLLm4h_2uPneGToDmHo4o2dbDH3SZcW7SDat4-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Target numbers for setup time (Re: Keeping up data channel)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 21:49:58 -0000

On 5 July 2012 14:16, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:
> I think we are talking about different numbers here. I am concerned with the time from when the UI indicates you can start talking, to the time that you can start talking with a reasonable expectation that the other side will hear it.

You assume an application that performs user alerting and requires
user acceptance prior to establishing media.  That is certainly an
important use case, but not the only one.  In some other use cases the
signaling must occur after the user hits a button.

--Martin