IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 22 October 2013 10:25 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A945311E8117 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M9-kRFIFfcga for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48D311E834D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B412F39E12D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:24:54 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eUZPNF93nQ7Z for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:24:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.186] (unknown [188.113.88.47]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 716B639E062 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:24:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <52665274.9080705@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:24:52 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050909070407080102030004"
Subject: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:25:08 -0000

In my VP8 advocate draft, I referred to a subjective evaluation test
(test with
actual human viewers) done between VP8 and H.264 Baseline by a neutral
(non-Google) laboratory.

The attached presentation is the writeup of the results of that test.

-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email