IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] RTP usage: supporting RTP ECN?

"Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551D81A01D7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:56:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U67h5fkPsIJ5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:56:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D838D1A01C8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 01:56:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BBU48498; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:56:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:55:49 +0000
Received: from nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.38) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:56:22 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.85]) by nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 17:56:16 +0800
From: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] RTP usage: supporting RTP ECN?
Thread-Index: Ac85IlR9g4Ppx7noToe3jIdcqhi3Nw==
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:56:15 +0000
Message-ID: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB861952E2@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.85.206]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB861952E2nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/sl2KIMbCCMh95zjpeKik-YkzdrE
Subject: [rtcweb] RTP usage: supporting RTP ECN?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:56:30 -0000

Hi,

draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-12 doesn't have any description regarding to RTP ECN RFC6679. I'm wondering why. But from my point of view, it's worth some discussion. The usage of ECN is a trend though it is not universal in current network. Supporting it in browsers for RTP media transport may be good for future.

BR,
Rachel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email