IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8

David Singer <singer@apple.com> Tue, 05 November 2013 02:26 UTC

Return-Path: <singer@apple.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7611221E839C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:26:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9jzetC0czg6H for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:25:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in2.asia.apple.com (mail-out.asia.apple.com [17.82.254.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9F721E8118 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:25:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay3.asia.apple.com ( [17.82.200.17]) by mail-in2.asia.apple.com (Apple Singapore Mail Gateway) with SMTP id 18.0E.03695.13758725; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:25:53 +0800 (MYT)
X-AuditID: 1152fe06-b7f5a6d000000e6f-08-5278573152bd
Received: from galingale.asia.apple.com ( [17.82.200.117]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay3.asia.apple.com (Apple Singapore relay) with SMTP id EC.D2.26194.13758725; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:25:53 +0800 (MYT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from [17.83.34.55] (unknown [17.83.34.55]) by mail.asia.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0MVR0044KQR39E20@mail.asia.apple.com> for rtcweb@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:25:53 +0800 (SGT)
From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <5277CCC7.7000003@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:25:54 +0900
Message-id: <38496E6A-057F-4507-9FDA-B61A4BCFD797@apple.com>
References: <CAOqqYVEER_HprgauRawO+_gGdLdMY1MUY8jrMhhi3yVDL31bFg@mail.gmail.com> <20131102124801.GY3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <CA+23+fE1S_K93xk+3WNbq1RAFt8QD++pF74OJowu_+qz71H91g@mail.gmail.com> <5277CAC2.8000001@jesup.org> <5277CCC7.7000003@bbs.darktech.org>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiGHRCUNcwvCLI4P5xa4u1/9rZHRg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVcXTZD/aCxRwVb9+uZGtgvMvWxcjJISFgInHn7GYmCFtM4sK9 9UBxLg4hgd2MEmfvvWPsYuQAKzp7XQmkRkhgApPExr40EJtXQFDix+R7LCAlzALyEgfPy4KE mQW0JL4/amWBGDOfSeLJtI1gu4QFoiV+7XzGDmKzCahKPJhzjBHE5hQwkNjzciULiM0CFL+z 9RQLxCBhie+P77FA7LKROLl4DRPE0C4miWeTf4INFRFQkbhx7BY7xAOyEqfPPQfbLCHwlVVi 4rJ1jBMYhWchOXYWwrGzkBy7gJF5FaN4bmJmjm5mnpFeYnFmol5iQUFOql5yfu4mRnA4/2Pb wbjgteEhRgEORiUe3tlvi4KEWBPLiitzDzFKcDArifDu9q8IEuJNSaysSi3Kjy8qzUktPsQo zcGiJM77+295kJBAemJJanZqakFqEUyWiYNTqoFxhc3fPfncBtHzf920Yj0/n3l2sKJTZaa7 5Opl3TW5WadixVdv3n6vtHJZ6855KiUpQfYvA+eEc58oFxDy+Tm7O5ppQeAdDg43vQVR2XPP nmxoXbf0r4qz43yvKU/5JFmCN6wLaFwbqBf3vyso33l5sevqABnu+XWMRzJv5QkxRvW672tO 9lBiKc5INNRiLipOBAAz8+OrYwIAAA==
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiGHSiVNcwvCLIoL3X0mLtv3Z2B0aPJUt+ MgUwRnHZpKTmZJalFunbJXBlHF32g71gMUfF27cr2RoY77J1MXJwSAiYSJy9rtTFyAlkiklc uLeeDcQWEpjAJLGxLw3E5hUQlPgx+R4LSDmzgLzEwfOyIGFmAS2J749agcJcQOXzmSSeTNsI 1issEC3xa+czdhCbTUBV4sGcY4wgNqeAgcSelytZQGwWoPidradYIAYJS3x/fI8FYpeNxMnF a5gghnYxSTyb/BNsqIiAisSNY7fYIQ6VlTh97jnLBEaBWUjum4Vw3ywk9y1gZF7FKFqUmpNY aayXWJyZqJdYUJCTqpecn7uJERJ+gjsYP0w1PMQowMGoxMPL9LooSIg1say4MvcQowQHs5II 727/iiAh3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJDjNIcLErivLL/yoOEBNITS1KzU1MLUotgskwcnFINjJOf dfAvY45aLh1c8eVB5KGn973XWV2Kq9bas7VWq0tFzyXfxfdkoequtXuKlhn4ZFyX7Do1Kd9l 5lr1hIn955bwzeBNfNRXcvqQalDIPq8stxfF709HXU6bzM1bzttX0BGsVrJwzvrFBbIn5l+5 yPp9aQzHzbiCyi3Pwhe+Y5nHUPjq7uH0l0osxRmJhlrMRcWJAD2sfYk7AgAA
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 02:26:02 -0000

On Nov 5, 2013, at 1:35 , cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:

> On 04/11/2013 11:26 AM, Randell Jesup wrote:
>> Interop is certainly a consideration and that's where H.264's advantage lies.  (H.264's only real technical advantages are interop and the possibility of existing hardware support).
> 
>     When was Constrained Baseline Profile defined? Based on Wikipedia I'm guessing it was sometime in 2009. If so, how widely is it implemented?

It got its name then, yes.  Previously it was known as that portion of baseline that was compatible also with the main profile, which was such a mouthful, people finally gave it a name.

> 
>     We keep on referring to H.264 as a black box that is supported universally, but when you dig into the specifics (specific profile on specific platforms) the story is a lot less clear.
> 
> Gili
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status