Re: [rtcweb] Friday Call details for signaling discussion

[Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail]>]

On 10/19/11 01:22, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Below are the call-in details for Friday's call.  This is meant to 
> give any interested working group participants some extra time in 
> high-bandwidth discussions while we hash out the signaling proposals 
> that have circulated on the list.  I expect discussion will include 
> ROAP as well as either a proposal from Hadriel and/or Wolfgang Beck's 
> alt-ic draft.
Will you be sending out an official reading list before the call?

My current list of maybe-relevant material includes:

- draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling-00 (ROAP)
- draft-beck-rtcweb-alt-ic-00 (always using a single Web server)
- draft-partha-rtcweb-signaling-00 (advocates picking a standard 
signaling protocol, lists candidates)
- draft-ibc-rtcweb-sip-websocket-00 (on use of WebSocket as a SIP 
subprotocol)
- Neil Stratford's "low level JS API" proposal:
   
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1MfrFHKx6O6yWtIv_jqwyH-RAbm8AgRtXQ7dJTZz5J2g

I can't find any other docs at the moment.

Of these, I would see ROAP and Neil Stratford's document as the ones 
that come closest to being "concrete solutions" as I understood the 
intent of that word in the call sent out on October 4.

But I may have missed some, or the chairs might want to rule the "low 
level JS API" out of scope, since it's not an I-D (or referred to by an 
I-D) at this time.

                     Harald