Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Thu, 21 November 2013 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E32D1AE0E5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:29:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wZel79tb8DWn for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:29:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18991AE0B3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:29:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc-vpn3-1087.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9668250A86; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:29:40 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <528E5E3C.70008@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:30:15 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C0124621-13A9-42EA-BBD8-5D43822CD396@iii.ca>
References: <528D6C63.7050607@bbs.darktech.org>, <13BED03E-6853-4E49-BCCE-1FFB39571D36@yahoo.fr> <5A2BC34D-FE4D-4420-B52F-729087815F37@cisco.com> <E2B29CC6-C499-432C-8242-BD2A506F0BD0@iii.ca> <528E5E3C.70008@bbs.darktech.org>
To: Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:29:50 -0000

On Nov 21, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>; wrote:

> I also remember them saying that we are only at the beginning of this process and that they expect more performance improvements in the upcoming months.

Yes, they were very clear it just a early snap shot of what might be possible (right now it is only one direction for example). Their end goal (not where they are now) is the 1/3 CPU usage.