Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Wed, 26 October 2011 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC05F21F854F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SLBx-1dGy-wA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D7E21F854D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAIL2.acmepacket.com (10.0.0.22) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:09:12 -0400
Received: from MAIL1.acmepacket.com ([169.254.1.232]) by Mail2.acmepacket.com ([169.254.2.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:09:13 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology
Thread-Index: AQHMlBsgEKECh+8lQkm6uqfqXW9quA==
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:09:11 +0000
Message-ID: <05A4533D-5AB0-4E2B-9AEA-6B1D65BB493F@acmepacket.com>
References: <AAB480AA-8F03-4C25-8A7C-55B88D057C24@acmepacket.com> <42322A10-14A7-4600-820D-7612A1B12592@cisco.com> <3747C7CB-C039-4D15-A46C-8FDB9A47AF3A@acmepacket.com> <DD0E14D2-252F-442B-9AFC-8ECD6704794B@cisco.com> <201110261756.p9QHuke7006749@mtv-core-1.cisco.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233D45FF4@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <03898B72-CEEB-4A75-850A-5E453213418D@acmepacket.com> <CALiegfkeXn0rG=ah=XnuddnQ5fvbnQB7efs-Eu5fMc-ZTo7UkQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfkeXn0rG=ah=XnuddnQ5fvbnQB7efs-Eu5fMc-ZTo7UkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.0.0.30]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <6803D20D17F18D4AA8661D6EE2C1BF0D@acmepacket.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAWE=
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:09:17 -0000

Agreed - ALGs are bad.  B2BUAs, on the other hand, are quite useful. ;)


On Oct 26, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:

> 2011/10/26 Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>:
>> I think you mean a WebSBC.
>> 
>> ;)
> 
> I'll be happy if I never see a "WebRTC ALG Router" :)
> 
> -- 
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>