IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Thu, 20 June 2013 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3841921F9AD3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Raca6M9x08Xg for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F0F21F9EAF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fb1so6528150pad.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=2Iv0UF7U+RPXatAy/Pb0pfNTN1IzX3e9ah2QVkh2UAs=; b=OcNcHdDz1Ui5BWL1SR0u4ZEwRFlCw72+HDedMEN/RNbvWwPhmAmZvfrKSwvU3BAeKr XllwWEUKflFoTAx0d4SHA4VGGfjvZF2j9Oo8LJWUgpcPAbSw7xDalAqlVuZSS4HB3CfJ EY2ATXRQ62v75OSZ+wf8WgfSRJSVJZCAEiSDr+w2qsAfRDFYVmkhqDYM8L+61+4A2HTV RwlQebjDm5cd5KKNFHETP/+FGRCxz3BZrN44qRcOHQnnq1l72MrBc8XfGT7sjT7uVKrv gWPwKa1CA4f66whb4ThBokS52x2+IYJXZHQtshmhcx2rBGxaNj7nm7ShYztQbkk8ULvv UVbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=2Iv0UF7U+RPXatAy/Pb0pfNTN1IzX3e9ah2QVkh2UAs=; b=JmyJL3eMKj/tY+g18bGFS4XLWJgqfiX6k5/TgdP2D8EDsI7WyWM54CfV2SjpsJMqdn fqhwX3aHi9153ig3c/wLgNfEGNmbB4yq6Xnfu2F6NrENVbT1SKOfXt9tV0uYYbCYGYYn btNIATJBlUKVNcro6VWf0HMAsyfDfDBweLdKVVZb0VC8nbUoxIsbRKAy/G40d+oQVV7K gGN5l2pF3lj3fHOsOG9ekkEPN7kwx36/0XMvSS0Yz4Z4J4FVw7rbJ1dvs+5RhlUUlEHd Zlj+UlB3vBiRZtQXkNZC6hAO/njG00OjmvScORfS6WTQPTsGCea0QhCafY9s4E7pblCT JhfQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.1.226 with SMTP id 2mr8635607pbp.150.1371749536145; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.88.8 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51C339EA.3050103@matthew.at>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHCkQSLab2UuY_vWP3Gr8uh+++c9mDq5f4sCpuaK5aeLQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C1B907.8060508@hookflash.com> <CAJrXDUG06jvPvhfNwZ6Puzxj7E4XxELG_fU=S7B_c=tnC9eoNQ@mail.gmail.com> <78192824-A516-4376-8D4F-3B052ED47A0C@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUGOYc_Z_qWD7J0ZzVdfwYOacH_p5PjZEg5aP1LUetffMA@mail.gmail.com> <51C1F2E9.20405@hookflash.com> <51C1F5ED.9090308@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUFvL2U5jfKMvcTJ_Pi_Yj=t1LoZO7MZTJcZavuByw5b_Q@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3B1680@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUGZ=M4SsSCYLUjs36C7JcbRPj2jhreKJgqH51YR_8oc-Q@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3B1A1C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHuHY5p-A5WprPJ1jUbe4+9RYoJoRJFbpMFyEJKhB=FBQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C339EA.3050103@matthew.at>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:31:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUFFQc2z+1WVz21poOBy9QsrzcRZV53EHSn4mcLoSKh3YA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec5314817d2c29804df995373"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlpV8hJWA9ibYFH43t044nzvrDXhOv7tm8BwbKtWVNiSaVS7nVl6jNdQKtMJ/3hpaCMA2EKkktknwjAInwc/DuisC/kkHopxKiHLoTBHQOhfqK66USJryx3x6V39kL34zIdSeSWOyF/wccV/a1CF2St1Cra5Y0M81mUFHCooU3HRdR14xCLND4BjbX7DEjhOCKbB5+l
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:32:24 -0000

Would you support incremental improvements that remove the offer/answer
state machine?  If so, I suggest you draft and propose such incremental
improvements.  I would love to see them.


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>wrote:

> On 6/20/2013 10:18 AM, Peter Thatcher wrote:
>
>>  But I don't think CU-RTC is going to work well in the latter, since the
>> authors categorically reject incremental improvement.
>>
>>
>>
> As long as the incremental improvement removes the offer/answer state
> machine, then that statement is false.
>
> Matthew Kaufman
>

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status