Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing

[Emil Ivov <[e-mail]>]

Hey Harald,

На 19.09.11 09:28, Harald Alvestrand написа:
>> B) Where a remote peer can provide one or more input types such as mouse
>> and keyboard to control the local system, not only including the
>> browser, but also other operating system resources. This clearly can
>> only happen after additional consent, most likely on a per occasion
>> consent.
> I see this as a  more tricky thing to get right (in most apps, the 
> mixing of events from multiple sources depends strongly on both proper 
> timing/sequencing and reliable delivery). I would like to not address 
> this for now (RTCWeb version 1).

I wouldn't be that worried about this. From the feedback we are getting
from our implementation, users don't seem to mind asynchronous even
delivery that much. They simply expect remote control to lag a little
bit when interacting with a remote desktop.

Cheers,
Emil


--
http://jitsi.org