Re: [rtcweb] Use-case grouping

"Point-to-point" seems more flexible. Such a group would allow us to address use cases invovling devices (such as IP phones or mobile phones) which don't have a browser.

Huilan 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 1:11 PM
> To: Harald Alvestrand; rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use-case grouping
> 
> Hi Harald,
> 
> We could add a "Point-to-point", or "Browser-to-browser", 
> use-case group.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> ________________________________
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Harald Alvestrand [harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 6:30 PM
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use-case grouping
> 
> Seems to me sensible to have groupings.
> 
> The use case I don't see a place for at the moment is the 
> single point-to-point call; the proposed use case I don't see 
> mentioned below is my suggestion for "interoperable calling".
> 
> So this might require more tuning.
> 
> On 06/21/11 14:39, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It's nice to see the amount of use-cases people have submitted :)
> 
> 
> Now, since many of the use-cases are related to each other, 
> and in order to get a better and easy-to-read structure of 
> the document, I would like to suggest to devide the use-cases 
> into different "use-case groups".
> 
> Below is a proposed grouping, and examples of use-cases which 
> would be listed in each group. I have only used the existing 
> use-cases, and the ones suggested by Cullen, but I am aware 
> that more use-cases have been proposed :)
> 
> 
> Telephony use-cases:
> 
>     - Telephony terminal use-case (draft)
>     - Call fedex use-case (Cullen)
> 
> 
> Video conferenceing use-cases:
> 
>     - With central server (draft)
>     - Without central server (draft)
>     - Hockey (draft)
>     - Screen re-size (Cullen)
> 
> 
> Embedded voice communicatoin use-case:
> 
>    - Multiparty on-line game with voice communication (draft)
> 
> 
> Bandwidth/QoS/mobility use-cases:
> 
>    - NIC Change (Cullen)
>    - QoS Marking (Cullen)
> 
> 
> 
> Later, we can of course modify/add/remove groups, but I think 
> the grouping above would be a good start, and I think all the 
> use-cases so far proposed would fit into one of those groups.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 