Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Mon, 22 September 2014 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDF51A1A19 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q4R0bDTz2uBW for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6585A1A1A16 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2799; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1411360421; x=1412570021; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=yuZczqzWL9O5DSVm4zyCJk9kNzbwneoI7Nd/BjewwHg=; b=W9GJ1IdlUKFl8NQ5+bXho/pytXCTaOcCcaGwvfsgioHop5ewsGGAxfSO F/4E+KmgTJvg7KpwgQAYPR3Qhw5eY+ve4nxiHBC3RndS3BKgkEVRePhZD ozlkdpl3WPytG+ky/6l7xwopZGbL60Xi8vu7g215oeHq1I5duVheR6MfY g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFAJalH1StJA2G/2dsb2JhbABggw5TW8oTCoZ5VAGBBBYBeYQDAQEBBAEBARpRFwQCAQgRAwEBASgHIQYLFAkIAgQBEogqAxENvAYNhy8BEwSNV4I2BoRFBYsJhDeCF4kvghCPDYZFg2FsgUiBAgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,569,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="79965605"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2014 04:33:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8M4XdsT018669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 04:33:39 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com ([169.254.11.227]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 23:33:39 -0500
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
Thread-Index: AQHP1h5hgsoXTLjsZUGnIevMd7afnw==
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 04:33:38 +0000
Message-ID: <D045A576.136BC%rmohanr@cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCZT1XW4LLaJ4Nq2DbrxD59cYnjLo5JXn9fjEb8pyamaQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D41CDC3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAKz0y8zycsyr9m4BA=-8xOaWkU+Sog5Mbz7K-oN3woqi++mVzg@mail.gmail.com> <53F451CF.10705@alvestrand.no> <001b01cfbc94$fccd5310$f667f930$@co.in> <CAKz0y8zNM3rc3XC6JqrK+d4hXiT5TomhNM+W2twg0+-83-pFow@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUnfB5bskH4zWRfBMdHbSoqftV5Fo_GEXoLt9XCH9Tt_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsT9Vdm0=tjk9WsLAH4ekbAizgyjm--168TrOf8UAYGZw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXUpibu8kWYmbJJJT2J3RNGXFV8LbceLijgG0U-pGY2xQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKz0y8z_oBf2efavfOLgzqE1R8sZstefZ1tvwwJLkhRskXZERQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsSqA=cki_fSaqAPP0GXCv_kHr6571C+K9ze4ceHCGYdQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D427B68@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <D01D6B42.104F8%rmohanr@cisco.com> <009001cfbe4f$6b92f280$42b8d780$@co.in> <CAKz0y8y3=0_-jwWiviR_Uj6tSq75NEq92Ocergc_NvFk2h_72Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxugaPq=cLppPUqT8CUADV-E2zDMcz6m3sUgKOnK-TdQfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU6kv+=jQuxj4Ci-zYW9mHEfJ=6jqqrdqDTopPN06-kgw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=7ouEv2wkD=WFmVKYvufCCsPEdbii0HG8aa0YaaJb15g@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D44E78E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <D03F4FB3.12EAA%rmohanr@cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D44EC29@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D44EC29@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.3.140616
x-originating-ip: [173.39.65.37]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <5908EADDDA26994C94A5B924E067D25B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/tiGU_XpBct-cVAqU54sDbucX24c
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 04:33:43 -0000

Ok will take care of these.

Ram

-----Original Message-----
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Date: Wednesday, 17 September 2014 5:07 pm
To: Cisco Employee <rmohanr@cisco.com>, Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

>Hi,
>
>The latest version look good. A couple of editorial comments:
>
>
>Q1:
>-----
>
>In the Introduction, maybe we could modify the last paragraph in the
>following way:
>
>	"When a (full) ICE implementation interworks with an ICE-lite
>	implementation the ICE-lite implementation will not generate consent
>	checks. It will, however, response to consent checks in the same way
>	as it responds to any other STUN binding request."
>
>I think that makes it more clear that the draft does not require any
>changes to existing ICE-lite implementations.
>
>
>Q2:
>-----
>
>In section 4.1, maybe you could be more clear and say:
>
>"A WebRTC implementation [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-overview], which implements
>*(full)* ICE"
>
>
>Thanks!
>
>Regards,
>
>Christer
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) [mailto:rmohanr@cisco.com]
>Sent: 17. syyskuuta 2014 12:15
>To: Christer Holmberg; Iñaki Baz Castillo; rtcweb@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for
>draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
>
>Please look at the latest revision and let us know if any other text is
>needed for this.
>
>Ram
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
>Date: Wednesday, 17 September 2014 1:24 pm
>To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Martin Thomson
><martin.thomson@gmail.com>
>Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call
>for	draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
>
>>+1
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Christer
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz
>>Castillo
>>Sent: 16. syyskuuta 2014 15:05
>>To: Martin Thomson
>>Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
>>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for
>>draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
>>
>>2014-08-25 19:15 GMT+02:00 Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>:
>>> Any WebRTC entity MUST implement full ICE
>>
>>Why? In server side implementing ICE-Lite is really operational and
>>*easier*.
>>
>>Please, don't drop ICE-Lite.
>>
>>
>>--
>>Iñaki Baz Castillo
>><ibc@aliax.net>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>rtcweb mailing list
>>rtcweb@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>_______________________________________________
>>rtcweb mailing list
>>rtcweb@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>