Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when"

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 13 November 2013 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF0221E80D2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:02:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VER0hDBcsORu for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:02:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4489011E8107 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:02:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92F539E216 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:02:35 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DlDdA9-mw0K for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:02:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.30.42.84] (unknown [62.109.39.85]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CA7739E209 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:02:35 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5283DADA.2080806@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:02:34 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <5282A340.7010405@gondwanaland.com> <20131113165526.GA13468@verdi>
In-Reply-To: <20131113165526.GA13468@verdi>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when"
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:02:42 -0000

On 11/13/2013 05:55 PM, John Leslie wrote:
>    Both H.264 and VP8 deserve "SHOULD implement" status. Neither,
> IMHO, will achieve consensus for "MUST implement" status. Yes, this
> is a sorry state to find ourselves in. But the marketplace has
> sorted out much worse problems in my memory.
>
>    And I claim that both camps are actually more likely to implement
> (or allow extensions for) the other side's codec if it is _not_ MTI,
> simply because they can back out at the first sign of lawyers.
>
>    I will not go into any details about how VP8 endpoints might talk
> to H.264 endpoints, but I'm _very_ confident ways will be found if
> we actually _publish_ an RFC saying both are "SHOULD implement".

I don't know if many noticed it, but one reason for my fiddling with
devices to show Hangouts working on stage at the meeting was to show
that transcoding is in fact working in real services that people are
using on a day-to-day basis.

Sure, it's not optimal. In fact, it hurts. But it's not the end of the
world either.

-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.