Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Fri, 22 November 2013 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5ED1AC43E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:39:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.425
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7rsXvKvAhErw for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:39:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B821A1F19 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:39:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netb.Speedport_W_700V ([91.35.61.205]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MLA45-1Vjwgn0fI1-000NNv for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:38:52 +0100
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Stefan Slivinski <sslivinski@lifesize.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:38:53 +0100
Message-ID: <jlct8957tvost0jf53ksevijepp4djqh3v@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <8AE7D014-DED6-48EB-99C7-CF9952CF4FA6@apple.com> <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA8AD7ED@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com>
In-Reply-To: <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA8AD7ED@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:NkHehzdYvTZffD9j5TbmZ1vUoxZPPPlqtBYWeSAK8uls2PGPmMW wDTZVcrcywX4TfoFyCukLCaU1vs/fVWtZeixAMz7pl/8L5z1+OZxnC95XAzpqaLkLZ+oQDo vFs8trtrXk3nyV+07GtDkunxHVltrGOjxCP7mqyP8W7De4yMt34E2ii25hlKrHz3Y3zZN+g Cc3O76bD1CWamoydVWRCQ==
Cc: "'rtcweb@ietf.org'" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 01:39:02 -0000

* Stefan Slivinski wrote:
>The fact that h.261 is getting so much attention is distressing  

It might be helpful if someone explained how H.261 compares to something
people can relate to better. Like animated GIFs, or sending a bunch of
JPEG images in a row at certain frame rates, resolutions, compression
ratios.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/