Re: [rtcweb] Just browser-browser and browser-"gateway"? is this an RTCweb assumption?

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Fri, 13 April 2012 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635E421F8763 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86xGVJryJ5pG for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D958A21F875C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yhkk25 with SMTP id k25so1734498yhk.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=+HRGt9/qEcVNE1+9uEqYpys/nv7aIg8XNEdRTVGOLNU=; b=KcKhIqBtslNs+XZvEAPOAnsx9kXWVbqbpsGEsABQPfI5qm0h/dr+OQvoAvuke8g3Jj 9yeU+a+46LOXG0EAFIcOVdNmMTbbegF4naZyeXQ4BpDRkLaWenfPgh/kF5dmfdU5I1ms SG8bWeVZIKSjre11YonWl4E3bA2IC+oUYBYEIt0fMO8SoJ37n8/S7gp0E6WVIyae2WPJ UKvq7rDxEFBerCbHZqT3G0hxlLm20Pun0dlp+FqP5Y4vlOzg5NEDOWQmL0F++xhzLr31 SRo00OcUp3r5i/mzUUmzej4Lhkist5m0whDoW/5y/Vh47wAAip1ByjC8Rwxo2GiNeWOo OwXw==
Received: by 10.236.143.106 with SMTP id k70mr1267587yhj.38.1334318114354; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.93.7 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F88105A.3060105@alvestrand.no>
References: <CALiegf=uDMycijcC+V6e+T0T8ZPkDvH1+TZS6rQ4BKXBU=+dJg@mail.gmail.com> <4F88105A.3060105@alvestrand.no>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:54:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfn_DVveib2b4VEnCN4eboyTLEpBbLw=8s=zXS1ZfeV0Og@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmA0P+3mrePL8GpMMKyOyo3s5iJ/kVhhjjjBomIFi2GF2Tu1qTFFxNGXVbAvNRKclpJquyd
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Just browser-browser and browser-"gateway"? is this an RTCweb assumption?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:55:15 -0000

2012/4/13 Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>:
> But the burden is 1) on the RTCWEB group to define what the protocols are,
> and 2) on the other devices to conform to those protocols.

Right. But the more *new* RTCweb media specifications are required,
the harder it will interoperate with other protocols.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>