Re: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applications

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 20 September 2011 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E6221F8BF0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G-yVqp7dq6eE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300A321F8BE4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so567037vws.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.175.229 with SMTP id cd5mr454519vdc.363.1316511641667; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.94.200 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7D7982AF-7478-4AFD-9F39-ED04A43FEF53@edvina.net>
References: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233EDB21D@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <1D062974A4845E4D8A343C653804920206648CB0@XMB-BGL-414.cisco.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233EDB264@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <1D062974A4845E4D8A343C653804920206648CEB@XMB-BGL-414.cisco.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233EDB2F0@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <1D062974A4845E4D8A343C653804920206648D0F@XMB-BGL-414.cisco.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233EDB3E5@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <4E70D2E6.1000809@alvestrand.no> <CABcZeBORi5NLSsztnMfkwL43p9oKG9mi6e1WWOaiafAO_DpTVg@mail.gmail.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233D45FA3@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <CABcZeBO9hUSYZhLrcfbaK9HLGXq-q1EvqWOy6-gAN5xom6Z2-A@mail.gmail.com> <092401cc749b$8fd64940$af82dbc0$@com> <CABcZeBPgRD6kb2gg=m9NckSa1wrzwzJS6527nYqFG34b0cjfgQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E765E4A.3050801@alvestrand.no> <7532C74D-D0D7-474D-80C7-61C07E9290AA@edvina.net> <2B265ADC-44C3-48CC-95A6-B90ED6E42FA7@acmepacket.com> <7D7982AF-7478-4AFD-9F39-ED04A43FEF53@edvina.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:40:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfmFzfWpF2VcmZsrxcpmQsP7nq3wsorQJGVF9VfVATkb7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applications
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:38:17 -0000

2011/9/19 Olle E. Johansson <oej@edvina.net>et>:
> So if we rephrase the issue: I think RTCP should be a MUST for rtcweb implementations. However, calls should not fail when communicating with RTP implementations that doesn't send RTCP.

+1

Be flexible on receiving and strict in sending.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>