IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] SDP Offer/Answer draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling: Glare handling

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 18 October 2011 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8AE21F86C1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.635
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.635 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ENTtAXDeV72D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828C821F8BDE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so805323vws.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.184.103 with SMTP id et7mr3909630vdc.35.1318963665957; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.118.143 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <44B1D328-3875-4E82-9338-AB223E09BB8A@cisco.com>
References: <15B0E3AD-3086-499A-8E79-7AE58B3376C4@cisco.com> <4E9D8D82.707@ericsson.com> <CALiegfmuxvwqJMppy4DC7162T4TrCjM3O_FnfpyNujDFuy9o+A@mail.gmail.com> <44B1D328-3875-4E82-9338-AB223E09BB8A@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:47:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfk0C+TnbRzdTuvjoZajBLpWON9K6V2C8duqPORR5LSbPw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Jonathan Rosenberg <jonathan.rosenberg@skype.net>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Offer/Answer draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling: Glare handling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:47:52 -0000

2011/10/18 Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>:
> People mean different things by realtime but when talking about it, I think it is important to keep in mind it is mostly the media that needs to be realtime and perhaps the signaling to set up such media is not as does not have the same level of constraints.

Yes, but it's not just about signaling realtime. HTTP polling means
unnecesary traffic from client to server. In the other side, WebSocket
(bidirectional communication without polling) allow the server
communicating to the client when it has something to say.

Also I expect that WebSocket will be very common and extended the day
RTCweb becomes a reality.

Regards.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status