Re: [rtcweb] Asking TLS for help with media isolation

Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> Tue, 08 April 2014 16:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA151A050E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.773
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qy4w44_VGOsA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFE61A04BC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=582; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1396974815; x=1398184415; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/Cux0EMVcZkvRASGNY2YFL8DEpfNRvXfMNNmZRlhtx8=; b=Bw/3Mm/ax8efCOFjKy6Lb71NsONZCeRRIFaDUn3bfPtLKCcMftIZ89Tr AzUg/RIJVWDd5mDNgtVDvPt+WAB1zyO3G4HQ9J5KURFMpxwPntdedWd50 F2iq+W+XJU9sKvmjg4n0w9kEf0ULuOMwa/YNtjKRcpbLmmUzU0DJlFEo5 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFANgjRFOrRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABZgwbFPIEgFnSCJQEBAQMBOi4RBQsLRlcGE4d0B8obF445MweDJIEUAQOJW48ChlKLboNQHQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,819,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="316131118"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2014 16:33:34 +0000
Received: from [10.21.70.224] ([10.21.70.224]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s38GXXGV030176; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 16:33:34 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2B26CB@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:33:37 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E1CC8AB5-17A6-4F8C-9673-DFEFAA48459E@cisco.com>
References: <CABkgnnWWuU63Vd=gw+wrh2ADgVYtQzhoRzRE1sv5azJE=MhWDg@mail.gmail.com> <533F191D.8050109@alum.mit.edu> <CABkgnnVht5EmJ7a2LDh50ivjUdoTpJ8GannQKReBSJbVGQGmgA@mail.gmail.com> <53419ED4.8020102@alum.mit.edu> <CABkgnnVjZ51bt5WQ1uvHHUz-4xFzpXQGhuMqxeMpOqJ1d+hQiA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2B26CB@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/uC4gUlaRlnlhoXO-9tbqQqXjTvQ
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Asking TLS for help with media isolation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:33:39 -0000

On Apr 8, 2014, at 4:42 AM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>>> But ISTM there would need to be a different set of limitations for 
>>> non-browsers. For instance, to not echo the stream back to the source. 
>>> And not to store the stream in a place that the sender can retrieve.
>> 
>> Yes.  At the most abstract level, the requirements are the same.
>> Don't pass the media on to someone else.
> 
> How would that work with an intermediary mixer, transcoder, etc?

Or voicemail or an audio conference.

-d