IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Form of the video codec question

<Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com> Tue, 30 October 2012 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B47121F8506 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zkq1X-7YEiDM for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E647421F84FB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (in-mx.nokia.com [10.160.244.31]) by mgw-sa02.nokia.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q9UDpmw9030496; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:49 +0200
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.47]) by vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:48 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.1.221]) by 008-AM1MMR1-013.mgdnok.nokia.com ([2002:4136:1e2f::4136:1e2f]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.003; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:51:47 +0100
From: Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com
To: fluffy@cisco.com
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Form of the video codec question
Thread-Index: AQHNtgBtbZy4pFD9XE+/lsp6cw4np5fQkBoAgAETAACAAB9+gIAAFHTA
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:51:46 +0000
Message-ID: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7622F3E66@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCQBw27XwvZ=hARs1DyyQufY2H7R4FwYq-3P-Tp7T7W+w@mail.gmail.com> <FDBFA77C7400C74F87BC297393B53E352595FBA9@BY2PRD0710MB354.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7622F3B70@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1118A8265@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1118A8265@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [91.217.168.220]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2012 13:51:48.0069 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4ACB950:01CDB6A5]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Form of the video codec question
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:51:57 -0000

Hi,

Cullen Jennings (fluffy) [mailto:fluffy@cisco.com] wrote:
>
>On Oct 30, 2012, at 11:42 , Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com wrote:
>
>>
>> * Raise your hand if you think the WG must decide on at least one MTI video
>codec (at this time)
>> * Raise your hand if you think the WG should give up on MTI video codec
>(for now) and focus on making progress in other areas
>
>Agree this is critical but we took that previously and there was consensus for a
>MTI video codec.
>

True. I would just note that if I recall correctly that took place 15 months ago, which is a long time. Not sure if it has been refreshed afterwards. 

Markus

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status