Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-transports reference to TRAM discovery

"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com> Mon, 15 December 2014 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0A61A7021 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:56:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIqrcapRB-5c for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:56:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx11.unify.com (mx11.unify.com [62.134.46.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C170B1A1AFB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:56:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MCHP01HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.234]) by mx11.unify.com (Server) with ESMTP id DB1CC1EB851B; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:56:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.1.192]) by MCHP01HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.234]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:56:27 +0100
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
To: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] rtcweb-transports reference to TRAM discovery
Thread-Index: AdAYdVah0SPsel0ORrys7Zw+IDeNbwAAFj2AAAAnpIAAAkCNAA==
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:56:26 +0000
Message-ID: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E63FD67@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E63FB08@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <CABcZeBOpX0vM9NJeKY5e+S13oKrLW3Td53qcxRkCHa2=nv=EGg@mail.gmail.com> <CANO7kWBY1MTU1A2fWo0E5Y6TQ1o+vWSz22pnWz6+5s7SFQcP-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANO7kWBY1MTU1A2fWo0E5Y6TQ1o+vWSz22pnWz6+5s7SFQcP-g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.29.42.225]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E63FD67MCHP04MSXglobal_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/uKN-xfAHMpXGYRf6fsGb9YMxeFE
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-transports reference to TRAM discovery
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:56:31 -0000

+1 Also wondering why it is not appropriate?

F20 in the requirements draft states:

F20     The browser must support the use of STUN and TURN
           servers that are supplied by entities other than
           the web application (i.e. the network provider).

So I was thinking the need for specifying the discovery method would not be controversial.

Andy


From: Simon Perreault [mailto:sperreault@jive.com]
Sent: 15 December 2014 15:49
To: Eric Rescorla
Cc: Hutton, Andrew; rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-transports reference to TRAM discovery


On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com<mailto:ekr@rtfm.com>> wrote:
I do not believe that this is an appropriate requirement

Care to say why?

Thanks,
Simon