Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Tue, 05 November 2013 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4202821F9D19 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:20:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ak-jpdPjM1Ci for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:20:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7465B21F9D35 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:20:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id t60so4060461wes.26 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 15:20:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Fw1LcyRm1Gflpj589OK1kDRpKrHdS/63a3ci/YCqCpg=; b=i9EHcAoF46w8MZqEZzNvJqtc0KVvQTLd5rmxWYOxOpnSVGMUWF6fc7SL5pLpbLbMJw wl4GcZYkRjG0zkbiNNuOY7qflqgJz4y4OECJyftmrc9rlCXTXxptpkkxixz95qTTRUK4 11pJr2xSk8xzaBvtMN5GD8SsfC+HXn/+DHzV1g4ozNhv30twqZYWzmgDe7NVV103pzMP cvBvkrQqpyAORnX+h1uquhkfZjVLexwJsUaVAJlbhgBYAw4DN5rXCuSO6oS3HK06Yv95 JQCKOBjtttwJuUwon8KV0LagqZAk+eDgEA47kbakmP8OI5x2RzzvJw31k7taBad4+7Ll aN5A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.83.194 with SMTP id s2mr64871wiy.60.1383693626445; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 15:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.51.5 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.51.5 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:20:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKDfjgcKiGzXaxi4m7ch8nikL_rOu0Msd+U_-085bSdKZ4CLvw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOqqYVEER_HprgauRawO+_gGdLdMY1MUY8jrMhhi3yVDL31bFg@mail.gmail.com> <52740478.6030109@nostrum.com> <CAOJ7v-2+_4QZwc8vEtdwVDWSP-d-z+ggB0u+VM6WnA=f-k4-XA@mail.gmail.com> <BLU404-EAS261C783EDA4575EE1A7E53593F40@phx.gbl> <52750E3C.9060206@bbs.darktech.org> <CABkgnnVR9=oWVzRaRuD701tvZCtp+SO1n6c65hJELLVfB8QcOA@mail.gmail.com> <C21C6AC2-29F8-4DFF-BB48-5E3D625DCD65@phonefromhere.com> <CAPvvaaK-bKt-zDEq2qibRrm51VbRGAV=95JShKFdCpJszw5Tww@mail.gmail.com> <1383413266.41025.YahooMailNeo@web171304.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <5275395B.5060709@bbs.darktech.org> <7208CC8D-1F25-43A7-A887-C85D3B18363E@apple.com> <5277E85C.4060905@thaumas.net> <014601ced9b6$15233ff0$3f69bfd0$@shockey.us> <CAKDfjgcKiGzXaxi4m7ch8nikL_rOu0Msd+U_-085bSdKZ4CLvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:20:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4w-2+Z83q9NTJsn3kB4oB77katqOGNFh3GvpXORAJpTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Kristian Kielhofner <kris@kriskinc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0434bc141516dc04ea7647a0
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:20:37 -0000

On Nov 5, 2013 6:01 AM, "Kristian Kielhofner" <kris@kriskinc.com> wrote:
>
> You might be interested in my updated analysis here:
>
> http://blog.krisk.org/2013/09/apples-new-facetime-sip-perspective.html
>
> SIP "enhancements" indeed!

Oh that was excellent thank you! All the evidence to date on
videoconferencing points towards a smaller than 1500 quantum default for fq
codel.
>
>
> On Monday, November 4, 2013, Richard Shockey wrote:
>>
>>
>> That has been confirmed by independent Wireshark analysis.
>>
>> http://www.packetstan.com/2010/07/special-look-face-time-part-1.html
>>
>> Its also SIP with some Apple "enhancements"
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
>> Ralph Giles
>> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 1:33 PM
>> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264
>>
>> On 2013-11-04 5:51 AM, David Singer wrote:
>>
>> > reverse engineering suggests that FaceTime uses AVC (H.264).
>>
>> Reverse engineering isn't necessary to establish this, although it's
nice to
>> have ongoing confirmation of the details. :-)
>>
>> http://cdn1.appleinsider.com/facetime.002.jpg
>>
>>  -r
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from mobile device
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>