Re: [rtcweb] A plea for simplicity, marketability - and... who are we designing RTCWEB for?

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Thu, 20 October 2011 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6FB21F8BAE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Gb6IUyILdZ2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ADB21F8BA7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so4070014qyk.10 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.59.10 with SMTP id v10mr21211972pbq.16.1319122481475; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f50.google.com (mail-pz0-f50.google.com [209.85.210.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z3sm19718548pbu.7.2011.10.20.07.54.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so7505716pzk.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.32.138 with SMTP id j10mr14838767pbi.81.1319122477082; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.47.40 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegf=e05G3fwOZoKOYqtE7voPkanYEgWmGYJVSrFpiuJD-TQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9C8CA816-65FB-41A0-999C-4C43128CAAB4@danyork.org> <BLU152-W43CB8DACCEA54AA5558B2493EA0@phx.gbl> <E857C96A-0E73-486F-BF23-36BA897B449C@cisco.com> <BLU152-W19B31DA6C6DB2FE60FC51C93EB0@phx.gbl> <CALiegfkKhWwr4yY2vV-x2+01dys57_sYsSsoof=kEu5G3CL5oA@mail.gmail.com> <6DFC5313-2991-4FB5-811D-FC99D31F9298@edvina.net> <CALiegf=e05G3fwOZoKOYqtE7voPkanYEgWmGYJVSrFpiuJD-TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:54:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxstHLpYmV9b2K8wtG0+urqaEktth3zTWOZK_4tnYZ+2cQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?I=F1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52163d1a96a1d04afbc2277
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] A plea for simplicity, marketability - and... who are we designing RTCWEB for?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:54:47 -0000

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>; wrote:

> I strongly hope this WG will not waste time in discussions about "RTP
> over WebSocket", or it will become surrealist.
>
> I think it already became surrealist. I now understand why W3C holds
private discussions of the standards.
_____________
Roman Shpount