[rtcweb] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-05: (with COMMENT)
"Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 08 June 2015 12:28 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA451A1BBB; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 05:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bosc4BTREqLf; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 05:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4DE1A1A25; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 05:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.3.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150608122843.32038.25147.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 05:28:43 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/ufSQu0KEfWrhRU4bpH9FQWO6qfI>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-video.ad@ietf.org, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtcweb-video@ietf.org, rtcweb@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtcweb-video.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 12:28:45 -0000
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-video/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I do wonder that the Abstract and Introduction are both short, and, yet, give such different descriptions of the document as to make it look like two different documents. Given how short they are, perhaps it really is best to make them the same, no? Abstract: This specification provides the requirements and considerations for WebRTC applications to send and receive video across a network. It specifies the video processing that is required, as well as video codecs and their parameters. Introduction: This specification defines how the video is used and discusses special considerations for processing the video. It also covers the video- related algorithms WebRTC devices need to support.