Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the fingerprint attribute?
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Fri, 11 July 2014 16:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCA41B2BBC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lx-wA2RoDJhr for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com (mail-qc0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F141B2BA9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i17so1197167qcy.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rp9qzQIh4MSEM23Q6fyY9DlzXTRpJ6kstPhn3z/wFjc=; b=UDB7GdgphIQUvqFfP8gQzshji623DWbUz5b7bnVYUIj2DYki4EgUYcTnVLgya+s40+ 5E4awGVJP/iKMTdv4fClDxPIdUPUnZlHRDryL9cC0hebJ0k97wN5Os2cywY+2nAubbIp SYCL2jEl3pULxrb7sw0+FqSxBoGFtuHoLD0Oxk2bCazPIIZJ1dz7XcAqs3OhXX3/g8sF caIZeu5cO6CpOCnXlHmssDA29Vji9HPEU1h8hZcwY+vty3Abcr2hk3CLB5nEIkxjbjEg +gJs8/rxDveWRcXAFknyTqg3gGoipO2gCCdIfKaOJYF4UPkWmjqa6t+yGYzfx+seQUvl GH2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQllvKtCiIow7ivj2jkc1waD+DzQVxtHhreuRokWTw3+bJ/RhCJPOrYjjiTwcsPs5psxk5As
X-Received: by 10.140.47.173 with SMTP id m42mr91217621qga.9.1405096301692; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.234.161 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-1EJhcS-faMt7dB+J4Xioz64Cu6CZMEPrDr8Hk_Giss_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfmwrik8TMb2J=33WzR1mc+X1usq2vVBZW=u-PbX17sdaw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHgZEq72ACGdjBQBqu_vtT7+-L3G=uLAGR8w9KV4mCMAdR6=0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1EJhcS-faMt7dB+J4Xioz64Cu6CZMEPrDr8Hk_Giss_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:31:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfkjEROWM7GVd_ZosVttwmutnUu1GWTrWDzXwzOARozbbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/uj3E6xYzgNoKQHyIAa-CDAotnrA
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the fingerprint attribute?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:31:50 -0000
2014-07-11 17:58 GMT+02:00 Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>: > The recommended algorithms to support probably needs to appear in the > security document; JSEP should also mention or point to the recommended > algorithms to use when generating the digest. Agreed. There are too many possible hash algorithms and it's unfeasible to expect that different implementations may support all of them. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the fingerpri… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the finge… Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the finge… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the finge… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the finge… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the finge… Martin Thomson