Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-02.txt
"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Fri, 11 April 2014 17:52 UTC
Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39041A0736 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.773
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mo16xfUqsTVA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B861A073E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4669; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1397238722; x=1398448322; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=dmWDVol1r+qTBuZUs65n1EDx43VeSgV3eCcWiw4fHCg=; b=m3HJ2fCrhcCxACQN0u6x1MRO5cAZon7lFJqXiySDmKb6E5q2MXXriGo5 /FCmc2zBtBLIsirq3tP4JX2OmZW6qrF1+Kfm5yJn6PA74c1wWcX0KDFNh spKKxWGUg0OVNDU/gb3iUhjN/VCxOsd2iH6EVC6gUShP9GNo3g2+k9633 c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkEFABUrSFOtJA2L/2dsb2JhbABZgwY7UQa9HYZkUYEeFnSCJQEBAQQBAQE3NBcEAgEIEQMBAQEfCQcnCxQJCAIEARIJEodhCAXLfxeOGwEBHDUFBoQyBJhggTWRDYMxgXI5
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,843,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="317142839"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2014 17:52:01 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3BHq1t1024523 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:52:01 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com ([169.254.11.219]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:52:01 -0500
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPVa68NGhvZFhC3EOKQCShwM72RQ==
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:52:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CF6E24CE.87C6C%rmohanr@cisco.com>
References: <20140411033753.19230.46577.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CF6D6F0C.878CF%rmohanr@cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2BD7C3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CF6D8F50.87A2E%rmohanr@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF6D8F50.87A2E%rmohanr@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.65.34.193]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <73DC8948D93BE847937A0103983BCA10@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/urULR4imjyDLmXVPaaXWwEA4wO8
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-02.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:52:06 -0000
Found this mail thread in the archives where this issue was discussed but we have not reached to any conclusion - https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg04887.html With ICE-lite mode since the ICE-lite endpoint does not typically generate any binding requests, it may not generate STUN consent as well. This would means a malicious application (running on a ICE-lite endpoint) can use it for sending unwanted traffic. Should we mandate an ICE-lite implementation to generate a STUN consent request to its peer before it can send media ? Regards, Ram -----Original Message----- From: Ram Mohan Ravindranath <rmohanr@cisco.com> Date: Friday, 11 April 2014 12:23 pm To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-02.txt >Sure. We will add text for these two in the next revision. > >Thanks, >Ram > >-----Original Message----- >From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> >Date: Friday, 11 April 2014 12:22 pm >To: Ram Mohan Ravindranath <rmohanr@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" ><rtcweb@ietf.org> >Subject: RE: [rtcweb] I-D Action: >draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-02.txt > >>Hi, >> >>I think it would be good to have some text about usage of consent >>freshness when one entity is ICE lite. >> >>And, I think it would be good to make it more clear that the usage of >>consent is always negotiated per direction. >> >>Thanks! >> >>Regards, >> >>Christer >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ram Mohan R >>(rmohanr) >>Sent: 11. huhtikuuta 2014 8:01 >>To: rtcweb@ietf.org >>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: >>draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-02.txt >> >>Summary of changes in this revision >> >>Addressed the comments received from the WG. >>Removed the timers definition from solution overview and made the text >>more generic. >>Incorporated text from draft-thomson-rtcweb-consent. >>Most of the text of solution overview is re-written however the idea is >>still kept intact >> >> >>Comments are welcome. >> >>There is still some dangling reference (text) to SRTP/DTLS mechanism for >>consent which we will modify in the next revision >> >> >>Regards, >>Authors >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> >>Date: Friday, 11 April 2014 9:07 am >>To: "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org> >>Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org> >>Subject: [rtcweb] I-D Action: >>draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-02.txt >> >>> >>>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>>directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in >>>WEB-browsers Working Group of the IETF. >>> >>> Title : STUN Usage for Consent Freshness >>> Authors : Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal >>> Dan Wing >>> Ram Mohan Ravindranath >>> Tirumaleswar Reddy >>> Martin Thomson >>> Filename : draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-02.txt >>> Pages : 8 >>> Date : 2014-04-10 >>> >>>Abstract: >>> To prevent sending excessive traffic to an endpoint, periodic consent >>> needs to be obtained from that remote endpoint. >>> >>> This document describes a consent mechanism using a new STUN usage. >>> This same mechanism can also determine connection loss ("liveness") >>> with a remote peer. >>> >>> >>>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshne >>>ss/ >>> >>>There's also a htmlized version available at: >>>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-02 >>> >>>A diff from the previous version is available at: >>>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshne >>>ss- >>>02 >>> >>> >>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>>submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >>>tools.ietf.org. >>> >>>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>rtcweb mailing list >>>rtcweb@ietf.org >>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >> >>_______________________________________________ >>rtcweb mailing list >>rtcweb@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-conse… internet-drafts
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] ICE-Lite, Was: I-D Action: draft-iet… Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] ICE-Lite, Was: I-D Action: draft-iet… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] ICE-Lite, Was: I-D Action: draft-iet… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] ICE-Lite, Was: I-D Action: draft-iet… Karl Stahl