Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs
"Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)" <jlaurens@cisco.com> Wed, 30 October 2013 18:30 UTC
Return-Path: <jlaurens@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD9111E8182 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_74=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Coz6+k+o2uZb for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D7511E8181 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17150; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383157844; x=1384367444; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ZBEebiUmwaQLTOxylwpAHVF1wSHuNXCtlbKBVd5xDeM=; b=dvZ4d1U65yJkZs2w6RHZ30XoAz3u2MfWgZIV2Pwo8gtrL4Cw5bxksbnu 3FjQbS11rk2huzSDaexE5vTfw8f3UNJ2txazezSC+hX8rhhFAedJ/leVB KTtvHgSZ/VCb16L+KmXchGEaYJJ3+o1qjW1jkNoS5kNCvAQK7wuZf//D0 E=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 4459
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnwGAAZPcVKtJXG//2dsb2JhbABWA4MHOE4GtweIAkuBJxZ0giUBAQEDAQEBAWsLBQsCAQgOCgokAh8GCyUCBA4FCAYNh1oDCQYIBbBxDYlrjF+CPxYLDAQHEYMOgQ0DkC2BMIRCgxqLIwOFNIE7gWuCKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,603,1378857600"; d="p7s'?scan'208,217"; a="278627170"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2013 18:30:44 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9UIUh99009263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:30:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.247]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:30:43 -0500
From: "Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)" <jlaurens@cisco.com>
To: Leon Geyser <lgeyser@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs
Thread-Index: AQHO1Z4jKQxeI4sckkKmXOLHp/+Z/g==
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:30:42 +0000
Message-ID: <FCBEDCB500188C488DA30C874B94F80E1C018DD4@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
References: <527147FF.5010506@nostrum.com> <CAGgHUiRH81UAmLaan=MRGuk-RoJBuCJ7SsuB5516TiZcNi8FFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGgHUiRH81UAmLaan=MRGuk-RoJBuCJ7SsuB5516TiZcNi8FFA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.234.135]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_70C13BA3-5231-4D54-A600-1C72F6672465"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:30:49 -0000
" As long as there are ports of the source code and automatic build scripts contributed as part of the open source, we do not see difficulties in adding additional platforms." Jeremy Laurenson Distinguished Systems Engineer Global UCC Strategy Group +1 408 894-1349 Video chat now. Join my bridge Or find more contact options... http://cs.co/jlaurens http://cs.co/jlaurensbridge Business relevant Unified Communications use cases... On Oct 30, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Leon Geyser <lgeyser@gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately like Jonathan pointed out H.264 will only be able to be used royalty free on certain(most popular) platforms. > To be able to avoid negotiation failure we need a MTI codec that every potential now/future browser would be able to implement freely. > I like what Cisco did, but the solution seems a bit half-baked. > > On 30 October 2013 19:55, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote: > As Jonathan mentioned earlier, this morning Cisco announced that it will be open sourcing an H.264 implementation as well as gratis binary modules compiled from that source and hosted by Cisco for download. Mozilla will be modifying Firefox to support H.264 by downloading Cisco's binary module. > > In previous discussions of which codec should be MTI, Mozilla has stated that it could not accept H.264 as MTI, primarily because we could not deliver H.264 in Firefox. That obstacle is now removed, and we can accept either codec as MTI. > > Mozilla intends to continue supporting VP8 in WebRTC, but we will also support H.264. > > /a > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Leon Geyser
- [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Richard Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Simon Perreault
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Chris Wendt
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Cullen Jennings