Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)]

Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Wed, 05 October 2011 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4292221F8BDC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.69
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.69 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.909, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0novXAtNWG+y for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (mx.skype.net [78.141.177.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECC921F8B13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40ED416F6; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:46:19 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mx; bh=b1VcPRINERDpU7 DhER7KINtsQVY=; b=UWsYOP1lqHKte0Bk/2vUl0lmWkXdWTiEK8TBozF1N5qfXh Kbr2nkDajQxikGeLjrwB8UT0yY9wl22FyM6WvChHFWbL/edaSbqNvvwj8g3RkOrp g6S4tRzyjs+3WVDjZzRwGfkW+1QFQLLCIjSINBhck/ycBSnncjunGdBiI7Vfc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mx; b=D8X8qkA7C7axMjA3LIjIdD GmEZLM0H6Bi4P+xnvmcL/GRIdUV+J3qUomHHpbFjJD4KWtzDSMpTtpKMDDrCFcnz YgvB3NtnJVlC9fqZluWtZL0xdeeHk3MSnAK3qwUB50xK2ELUn9xKA/opgkCNN/3n TQxtERu2hYX+eT/NpWS+Q=
Received: from zimbra.skype.net (zimbra.skype.net [78.141.177.82]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4A47F6; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:46:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2143506F2C; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:46:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lu2-zimbra.skype.net
Received: from zimbra.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWUqagA1YVBC; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:46:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.10.155.2] (unknown [198.202.199.254]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C864F3506E4D; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:46:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E8BC4AF.30307@skype.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:45:03 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <CALiegfnOCxyTo9ffQ272+ncdu5UdgrtDT-dn10BWGTZMEjZoCg@mail.gmail.com>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0C0A@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>, <05CAC192-E462-421F-B1E5-B78DC8F60306@ag-projects.com>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0C93@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>, <16880306-5B3A-4EFD-ADE4-1201138D9182@acmepacket.com>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F137B@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>, <226C9800-9791-465A-B519-40935E2D135F@phonefromhere.com>, <4E8B1B86.2080805@jesup.org> <BLU152-W476B3866CE31803056E3C93FB0@phx.gbl> <AE47482D-C51A-4872-8868-9AF8D0E6CAB2@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <AE47482D-C51A-4872-8868-9AF8D0E6CAB2@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)]
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:43:18 -0000

On 10/4/2011 3:56 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> What are the things you are thinking of that decided that PSTN 
> connectivity was not high on the list? Perhaps we can look at which 
> ones ended up being successful.

The first one that comes to mind is TeamSpeak.

Oh, and Xbox Live VoIP.

Neither has PSTN connectivity and I think both fall into the "ended up 
being successful" camp.

Matthew Kaufman