Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP

+1

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Erik Lagerway <elagerway@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, I agree. SIP should take a back seat in this WG, as should jingle etc.
>
> On 2011-11-11, at 10:24 AM, Dan York <dan-ietf@danyork.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Iñaki Baz Castillo said:
>
>
> WebRTC is not SIP...
>
>
> IMHO we should stop talking about SIP in this WG....
>
>
> First priority is to define WebRTC regardless of federation...
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> <rtcweb@ietf.org>rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
> --
> Dan York   <dyork@lodestar2.com>dyork@lodestar2.com
> <http://www.danyork.com/>http://www.danyork.com/   skype:danyork
> Phone: +1-802-735-1624
> Twitter -  <http://twitter.com/danyork>http://twitter.com/danyork
> --------------------------------------------------------
> All comments and opinions are entirely my own and have no connection
> whatsoever to any employer, past or present. Indeed, by tomorrow even I
> might be disavowing these comments.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>