Re: [rtcweb] RFC 8855 registries

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Thu, 04 February 2021 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE943A15E6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:47:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1dncC3E1eDbq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:47:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5E183A15E0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:47:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id w8so4171381oie.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:47:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hhArRObEKlG0a/wtnC25Sqxxd/qVWzH8ebBpFEwle7g=; b=etZCsOAYpy1IWifZluQLp54gK4sKMdCeJ+WigUbAIb+bQYJuYMN45Peun5RGR4a6pY LmbVTisxdJnPjm2mJ09AxFRr3yshT8yF3cMrh+q4eVpYkBOw9nTrggPFl7UYJgR4+57X UiD1O9ulQoEnp93hKCTgV5X47QWGMmqT8rg3e7tP7i7yY7QDvGFDyoV3H8V7cNo6ZvHN 8wuUejy+toRLxf8XZFC/i12/iMqS40WnLce2qhu6OGiDBm/SmX5ySeceIgKLy9WvHkbQ Fhgw1XY1KcyIjfDO/FKUAEbl0RAW5sL4PltSlkqq0qRe7f7nqRtYCi2LnVVc0bpclf/i WxmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hhArRObEKlG0a/wtnC25Sqxxd/qVWzH8ebBpFEwle7g=; b=sjzixa3T4dr1PZSTShraJ3wNDJ9usQ1lN1C8j86mbjelqBDxTZgFz3rQNfU+cdn8cj wRT7HuHgK9bjHAcsckrZ7QHevq6TKgWIPdpxAIBOZ4YspLIG0cyVSLG4tYoLCAcHIwpt e7WBJ5f6thVaZ0T8Ocg63DVw2f7BpbSCrkjz0DlD9EhhDWGBq3oE5mR5/T3Dgr6/Ty+Y BXoxF+ktkwEqYGZXLz8s2iWE2aYzZXpG7ARmHmxM0yCxVPg6oA3jZ2vSx7lvHAWEEfXN dQlqMWrrxMblZQpanWlGeJuXJw2MxdAwOq+lhMyalRzEaUmUxJnLwitfT3d47bNjlgCy dziw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mv70mcve3zSnfUKtUSmQpv8Y1BN4p3itC+EF80Gsct8P6mVUf dcw5dOVMH5WbozNWHU+dMm1dWs9hjg/+tLj52SlmWQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvLo5ukXwnQVgZzoYiUSsiQ0up9ZCzHQcNzdR43D40RUd74I6/YuF7CUW457MjECXYCt9u/dAocijlzOG1qbI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:904:: with SMTP id w4mr27770oih.160.1612453667216; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:47:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwZ0hA4a-r_kNHPQUnSt-RhZx2SE=-YkFWBVaCQT4EJCgQ@mail.gmail.com> <AM0PR07MB386001A775A044C8867E5D2693B39@AM0PR07MB3860.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAL0qLwZ0KRQ12ak=X00WOJiuRCYJzOczjnDbx5GJs=X8c==kWA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfna7Kyc24pvze+VPD5qPc60o+xzJ5iNPiOV9nsxeALpAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYxvpswVZ1eWk6x-hw+VSP-kBiswQgKeqQxXKYaeeCCcw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYxvpswVZ1eWk6x-hw+VSP-kBiswQgKeqQxXKYaeeCCcw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:47:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegf=E-UtJ0aL5fYES8v54-D5CDXo2C415XtvDd35T92CZOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/v05a5Qc9J0dfdQeY2pnL50PM464>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RFC 8855 registries
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:47:50 -0000

> The chairs of that working group, when closing it, made that proposal.  I didn't think it sounded like a crazy idea given both contributed to C238, but if that was wrong, I'm happy to look for volunteers elsewhere.

I fail to see why WebRTC (or browsers or devices capable of running a
WebRTC stack) need a "unified" messaging protocol.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>