Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda posted

Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 24 July 2012 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DB921F85A5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.623, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AjH3BUsrvdBz for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3876321F858D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q6OFvKes001992 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:57:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q6OFvKus001210 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:57:20 -0500
Received: from [135.244.0.81] (faynberg.lra.lucent.com [135.244.0.81]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id q6OFvJxk023328; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:57:20 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <500EC5DF.7020408@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:57:19 -0400
From: Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMB69mvwLsYvhLQK9VqOqYYtc5hdRxSRPN_UTEuXUZv6EQ@mail.gmail.com> <50072142.8000208@alcatel-lucent.com> <CA+9kkMBipWC3u+Ztg7SxbMO6g0FU+UWoZDGq0agmL16cYraKYg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBipWC3u+Ztg7SxbMO6g0FU+UWoZDGq0agmL16cYraKYg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda posted
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:57:23 -0000

Ted,

Thanks for the consideration and for the effort.  I understand the 
scheduling problem very well (been there, done that...), and I know that 
it can become unmanageable, what with presenters being in other sessions 
or arriving late, or...

Needless to say, If there is any chance that at least some security 
discussions--in which I would very much want to participate,--could take 
place om the first session, I would very much appreciate it!

With thanks, again,

Igor



On 7/24/2012 11:31 AM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> Thanks for pointing out the potential conflict.  The chairs had a
> quick discussion of this issue this morning and, unfortunately, we
> probably are not going to be able to make this change.  There are
> always some conflicts, unfortunately, and we're sorry for any
> inconvenience.
>
> regards,
>
> Ted
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Igor Faynberg
> <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>  wrote:
>> Ted,
>>
>> I notice a conflict of the second session (which covers security) with
>> OAuth. Is it possible to change the schedule?  OAuth seems to be applicable
>> to RTCWeb authorization.
>>
>> It might be impossible to reschedule, but would you consider swapping the
>> content of the slots so that security is covered in the first session?
>>
>> With thanks,
>>
>> Igor
>>
>>
>> On 7/18/2012 3:48 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
>>> A draft agenda has been posted at:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/agenda/agenda-84-rtcweb
>>>
>>> Edits and adjustments still possible; comments to the list.
>>>
>>> Ted
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb