Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft -- Enterprise Policies

[Roman Shpount <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Ted Hardie <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Roman Shpount <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > 1. Enterprise would like to limit the amount of bandwidth available for
> > WebRTC communications per location and per user.
> >
>
> It's a bit hard to tease this apart from general per-user fairness methods
> and methods that would generally provide (or limit) capabilities for types
> of
> flows.  Why would an enterprise apply different limits because they were
> signalled with WebRTC?
>
>
I was trying to follow enterprise policies that are used in conjunction
with IP-PBX deployments in enterprises. Typically you would see the
location level limit. Once this location limit is reached, new real time
communications are not allowed, unless they are from high priority caller.
In this case, one of the flows from the low priority caller is disconnected
and high priority call is connected.

With WebRTC and variable rate codecs you can actually implement much better
bandwidth control schemes, but having an enterprise controlled TURN server
that manages bandwidth and QOS parameters and can attribute which
enterprise user this bandwidth is being used by can be very useful.
_____________
Roman Shpount