Re: [rtcweb] Basic scenario 'impossible?' to achieve with the actual API

[Lorenzo Miniero <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 18:13:48 +0200
Enrico Marocco <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On 7/2/13 6:04 PM, José Luis Millán wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Please, let me know how this normal use case could be solved with the
> > current API.
> 
> Just off the top of my head:
> 
> Audio-only call establishment:
> 
> A --{"action":"CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B
> B --{"action":"ACCEPT CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> A
> 
> Rejected audio+video upgrade proposal:
> 
> A --{"action":"UPGRADE","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B
> B --{"action":"REJECT UPGRADE"}-> A
> 
> Alice rolls back and removes local video display.
> 
> I may be missing something, but doesn't look like rocket science to me...
> 
> Enrico
> 
> 

For the same reasons I just wrote in response to Jim's mail, I'm not sure some kind of a REJECT-UPGRADE action would be enough to address such a scenario, especially in case, for instance, part of the update attempt was accepted and the rest rejected. Considering several different aspects of a session may be subject to change, such a mechanism should be aware of that.

Lorenzo

-- 
Lorenzo Miniero, COB

Meetecho s.r.l.
Web Conferencing and Collaboration Tools
http://www.meetecho.com