IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Wed, 08 January 2014 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D580F1AE12A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:44:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZC3vVC-GoP6p for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:44:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570631AE11C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:44:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpe-76-187-100-94.tx.res.rr.com ([76.187.100.94]:50159 helo=SDmac.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1W0z3H-00022t-8c for rtcweb@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:44:31 -0800
Message-ID: <52CDAA94.70904@usdonovans.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:44:20 -0600
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <20140108011831.GA18453@verdi> <CAMKM2Lyo0zvRGEhdtz7ea+xySt3nUBuwgSX3FBQyYR2k4aOxow@mail.gmail.com> <24246_1389192540_52CD655C_24246_10551_1_2842AD9A45C83B44B57635FD4831E60A06CBBE09@PEXCVZYM14.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AA548C9A1E@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <CAD6AjGQNysrp0MDFa+-TYgdCRt6M_iAWm-A29F63LJjt4QJLSg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQNysrp0MDFa+-TYgdCRt6M_iAWm-A29F63LJjt4QJLSg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020901080903070900020403"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:44:46 -0000

>
> 1.
>
>     All entities MUST support H.264
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
> 2.
>
>     All entities MUST support VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
> 3.
>
>     All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
> 4.
>
>     Browsers MUST support both H.264 and VP8, other entities MUST
>     support at least one of H.264 and VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: I don't see the benefit of differentiating
>         browsers and "other entities".  Interop should exist between
>         all recweb implementations.
>
> 5.
>
>     All entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: The selection of the MTI codec(s) must ensure
>         all implementations have at least one codec in common.  This
>         option does not address that requirement.
>
> 6.
>
>     All entities MUST support H.261
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
> 7.
>
>     There is no MTI video codec
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: The selection of the MTI codec(s) must ensure
>         all implementations have at least one codec in common.  This
>         option does not address that requirement.
>
> 8.
>
>     All entities MUST support H.261 and all entities MUST support at
>     least one of H.264 and VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: 
>
> 9.
>
>     All entities MUST support Theora
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: 
>
>10.
>
>     All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.261}
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
>11.
>
>     All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.263}
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
>12.
>
>     All entities MUST support decoding using both H.264 and VP8, and
>     MUST support encoding using at least one of H.264 or VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
>13.
>
>     All entities MUST support H.263
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
>14.
>
>     All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, Theora}
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
>15.
>
>     All entities MUST support decoding using Theora.
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: As I understand it, this does not guarantee
>         successful negotiation of a video codec.
>
>16.
>
>     All entities MUST support Motion JPEG
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email