IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Network times … was SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 01 May 2013 05:10 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7118521F8605 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WXNKifjWxK-P for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398BF21F896E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=805; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1367385023; x=1368594623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=DLZfOtp1OmhgwEcHwmel0BMjbAW3iyMAA6W76NaW3Wk=; b=CKh4GNUQSswu6D7QzAya2JRKubu2o5VPogCA+SMjYPN962gJXq44+e5u yWoOsnnWVdatLprvQ0ygbDPGLCe/XopuO56G+lKqRgEF315yizxL6E7gG g6gMK/eGFAanzNaOUwwh16o718qd6LfX8Ypi22C7jKZaR36vY8Yb3GQfq E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkAFABeigFGtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABSgweDJrwmfhZ0gh8BAQEDAXkFCwIBKiQyJQIEDgUIh34Gvx+NZYEDMQeCb2EDqFODDYIn
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,587,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="204875467"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2013 05:10:21 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r415ALNK025334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 1 May 2013 05:10:21 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.192]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 1 May 2013 00:10:21 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Thread-Topic: Network times … was SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
Thread-Index: AQHORiot3hT0toA1x0SAjJDE87njGw==
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 05:10:21 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134B0090@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <3FA2E46D-C98E-4FC0-9F1D-AD595A861CE1@iii.ca> <20130425202238.74EF321F96A5@ietfa.amsl.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48416281FDB@tk5ex14mbxc272.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F3BB8FAF7@US70UWXCHMBA04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF0E6C04AF@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <CAErhfrx6xi7rNmc6CZc5iyKiYv+oZbi3sBa5QywB7dUKtms2Aw@mail.gmail.com> <C643F355C8D33C48B983F1C1EA702A450B49EA@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <4AA3A95D6033ED488F8AE4E45F47448742B13620@WABOTH9MSGUSR8B.ITServices.sbc.com> <CALiegfmpZZigigQtaadsXup6VfWgJAF8--TJpbUwSJMmar7fRA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv2d2DemnjHQdB8XU8NKfK-Uu913DLPq9JUT4z9kvFfTQ@mail.gmail.com> <829F9A35-5F23-4A0F-9831-80478F70965E@phonefromhere.com> <517E2F6A.30905@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <517E2F6A.30905@alvestrand.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <56D0ED8C9724C4468E31FBD4C769E7CB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: [rtcweb] Network times … was SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 05:10:43 -0000

On Apr 29, 2013, at 2:29 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> Would it be possible to get real data on 1) and 2) here, so that we can stop talking about "slow" and instead talk about "N milliseconds"?
> 

I did try and round up a bunch of data for ping times from India to Singapore as some people were suggesting these were 1500ms. 

I got measurements from both home DSL and more business class from a range of sources in India. It seems that anywhere one could run video, you can ping any of Singapore, Tokyo, Boston, Palo Alto, and London in less than 250 ms one way. If someone has an actually link that is getting 1500 ms out of India, I'd love to get the info so I can see what I can learn (the buffer bloat folks want to hear about this :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email