Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Sat, 23 February 2019 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB10130F93 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:46:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M8l1a4byQYT8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:46:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x133.google.com (mail-it1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BCE612D4E9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:46:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x133.google.com with SMTP id m137so5780020ita.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:46:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=98l/SZb13KgQbkv7Qk9HCwvXQSVJonxKRoxxrA9YWJ4=; b=dnGkGya3lR6mZqwtQPlkZH420laS1zEU5Pz5+cJYHoqCEArFiQSiO1PfB8X8Ig1euA PCKmpPsatUfnpARSNTlFie3fASEtb1H/jkZJIMy8hSc4C+fnJPC3nJvq5/zsGYefnuRP VxvvKbFyVwd16haD1Er6lKqIa9fI40Wyc0oqoKq9nYGQV8j77MHgFoiPp3taA/aCx51E SF7GR7inucomZ+bFq89tRYSPomxP74z6XrOx2oCsLW7lfZF3ZW/3ExmUN1bhVtm1uZHA hXz40w2icYsyQe5l8DR5QSDVI7Ax9sVpzbo6+LKX9FAtQZDzSkh4IQOu+/lN3TebBpF5 ydAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=98l/SZb13KgQbkv7Qk9HCwvXQSVJonxKRoxxrA9YWJ4=; b=j40Wf/gNpmMcZHKIAISK7mnAHYIHCoJHTAgWAwrmtRGnIKB0sw/z1L2eIR/aA81T3d Id9RXzK35oLcK6rIBlFJiTZfTn449oEdr0kp5aUuqxKaggmwoKxQli2oYgmoTtpDYvcf X2g0/9MylsVLxOQXxuU6spEkf82W2XitQsMvLnvXosC3NJHHdM92ENdN5DPMavblNX/q /VgM3pdypJQ8+scbHz99c2dgLzmSBLUfSVYfr6mrJPZxq0M2JqKtt3BZQMhJDJi5KnbK eTPIYqULxdTsL6CgfhwLndmY9UwYqFuY8s/COY4STyUzDxkySo6TgRbAyDkeCiMDrdVG eVQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYG9HjLVZIHIPwInCLxCRHdapTzI5IPuIdJLoxKzdf3y+VmC42Y brXpx3QC9oeZxNbZSDyjwqvcOgOSNl3IheboEF9P+Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYgVkwcU/LacdTEUlntWE3B4BYTb1Ev+9MvMrP/CsSU9/If7z479aTl6zp29pY6QqB2DCVq/bGDZl7ts2NymfQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:28cb:: with SMTP id h194mr3910655ith.8.1550886394614; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:46:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMDMMfEU2QE9AkPXsCgHp1gB=X6_-jAKvH6FsWhqNkV_Kg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2QLpD5Y5xdB1jKPS3uqsh7TMFFMR57YB1KTPTCcJ1F7w@mail.gmail.com> <0F9730B2-3E44-439D-9832-4C4AEBC054B5@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxvHWr2wPhzdT_v8mAgOVBC0E1DHfGMqBNCtyGBD-+0U-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxvHWr2wPhzdT_v8mAgOVBC0E1DHfGMqBNCtyGBD-+0U-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:46:23 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2yHxAnzFsXFap=KgM8hWvOWksQVKnbO7UEfy475qURcg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a3aa6d058285e00f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/vHu_BN7OyjxHvDG5mMMcXX8goYc>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 01:46:39 -0000

Roman, thanks for raising this. I looked into this a bit and it's kind of
ambiguous; https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7850 uses "profile", "proto", and
"protocol" (although "protocol" is used most frequently).

JSEP actually uses both profile and protocol to refer to the transport,
depending on the section; if we make a change here, we should hit all
usages, which probably means that it is outside of the scope of this
particular issue.

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:19 PM Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>; wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> I did provide editorial feedback to the change on github:
>
> 1. This document refers to SDP protocol as profile. If you look at the
> referenced documents that define "profiles" in JSEP, they all refer to them
> as protocols. Also, in case of SRTP, profile is actually something
> different and refers to SRTP key parameters.
>
> 2. Default candidate does not have profile (or protocol), it has
> transport, port, and (connection-)address. So each "m=" and "c=" MUST be
> filled in with port, protocol, and address to match port, transport, and
> address of the default candidate for the m= section, as described in
> ice-sip-sdp.
>
> Regards,
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:05 PM Christer Holmberg <
> christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>; wrote:
>
>> Looks good.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Christer
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *rtcweb <rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org>; on behalf of Justin Uberti
>> <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org <40google..com@dmarc.ietf.org>>;
>> *Date: *Saturday, 16 February 2019 at 3.57
>> *To: *Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>;
>> *Cc: *"rtcweb@ietf.org"; <rtcweb@ietf.org>;
>> *Subject: *Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport
>> parameter issue
>>
>>
>>
>> I have updated this PR to incorporate minor feedback that was received
>> during the consensus call. Those who had feedback, please take another look
>> and comment on the PR if you are satisfied.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:56 PM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
>>
>> The chairs believe that there was rough consensus among those responding
>> to make the change in:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/pull/863
>>
>>
>>
>> Given the state of the document, it will be the Area Director's call as
>> to how much of the post-working group approval process must be re-done.
>> Authors, please wait on his direction before publishing a new version with
>> this merged.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ted and Sean
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>