IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Security Architecture: SDES support is a MUST

Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 19 July 2012 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A29621F860B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.742
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kknB2tFw+Byc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551DA21F85E3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q6JGPatX007238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:25:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q6JGPZRU028304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:25:35 -0500
Received: from [135.222.232.88] (USMUYN0L055118.mh.lucent.com [135.222.232.88]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id q6JGPYQO015127; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:25:35 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <500834FE.5040809@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:25:34 -0400
From: Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <201207190742.q6J7glf6008744@vivaldi29.register.it>
In-Reply-To: <201207190742.q6J7glf6008744@vivaldi29.register.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Security Architecture: SDES support is a MUST
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:24:49 -0000

On 7/19/2012 3:42 AM, Domenico Colella wrote:
> ...
> Why a company should buy ( ? expensive ?) DTLS-SRTP gateways (? and compatible with their legacy devices ?) or translators in order to support RTCWeb instead of a SRTMP server/gateway (i.e. open-source free products as Red5) and use FLASH ?..

Why is a "DTLS-SRTP gateway" needed--expensive or cheap?   DTLS-SRTP is 
end-to-end.

Igor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email