IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward

Gustavo Garcia <ggb@tokbox.com> Thu, 14 November 2013 05:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ggb@tokbox.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFBB21E81B4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:35:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3jNl+uXiqPSi for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:35:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys010aog105.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog105.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B945B21E81B3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:35:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-f172.google.com ([209.85.128.172]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob105.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUoRhKROcw8kXLq77gLr0ULH+BY2P43nm@postini.com; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:35:37 PST
Received: by mail-ve0-f172.google.com with SMTP id oz11so1318938veb.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:35:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=za38IGNqpKpFhwZFhIp7gASuuqHtdXKBnYJqEbZnVrs=; b=c9+NRiEiYH9YRIjxDWX0f18fraRE3L1IbJ+q/0CawelO5Njrog1RBMI77GQSWhK3kd z8jz6fHK92XWwbohp1HkK6IcQIN9RA/d2z2TZg3YqQZYvJ29liby4/xuj+BdEkRSAov9 lrSlKHr1aNkXjqJdYPijVA1q8pV4PCrD9Dpo7lcvU2J9SBWEplOpOySl2mcs7nlpFc4G sQ8l3mmQGDSOfZ2WyDdxQbljQxI6ShULi86SQHz1Ec89eYGBOvfWSLlqMupO5csqSGRk /5NYB+P0RXjZq221hyGuJUevDFHURxdxo3JqXyILKAqoBrJ9NMwmD2ffNCT5BnSj0cqm f3Xw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmkNLyazTDT6eOWVNXq0KttcFtaP5iR0AZWCFYHV0xup2QtBwZVi55lXoqgWvohtjddOpas+YNVJm6rXoJK4fKengDP/O6blPhO1MYygWJ68ZGBAAu+o33Wo1GoB/dEv9HSswNnUGbjowFcHwqDjpjiRdRVPw==
X-Received: by 10.52.187.138 with SMTP id fs10mr30102726vdc.10.1384407336566; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:35:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.187.138 with SMTP id fs10mr30102722vdc.10.1384407336463; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.211.200 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:35:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5283DFDC.4010906@ericsson.com>
References: <5283DFDC.4010906@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:35:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPvKHKgiUQ--5tpqMRy5eZN8-7JMjiu3fmWAQ4Tt5PpburYibQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gustavo Garcia <ggb@tokbox.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec548a38583c7e704eb1c735c"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:35:42 -0000

8. All entities MUST support VP8 and H.264 is RECOMMENDED to implement

Ensure interoperability with a common codec and avoid transcoding when
interconnecting with non-WebRTC platforms/devices as much as possible.


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo <
Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I hope everybody had a safe trip back home after Vancouver.
>
> As you all know, we need to make progress regarding the selection of the
> MTI video codec. The following are some of the alternatives we have on
> the table:
>
>  1. All entities MUST support H.264
>  2. All entities MUST support VP8
>  3. All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8
>  4. Browsers MUST support both H.264 and VP8
>  5. All entities MUST support either H.264 or VP8
>  6. All entities MUST support H.261
>  7. There is no MTI video codec
>
> If you want the group to consider additional alternatives to the ones
> above, please let the group know within the following *two weeks*. At
> that point, the chairs will be listing all the received alternatives and
> proposing a process to select one among them.
>
> Please, send your proposals in an email to the list. You do not need to
> write a draft; just send the text you would like to see in the final
> document regarding video codecs.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
> Responsible AD for this WG
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email