Re: [rtcweb] No Interim on SDES at this juncture

Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com> Fri, 14 June 2013 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DC721F9CEA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBQq9FKXWvdz for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4262C21F9A87 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r5EGHHOI015591 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:17:17 GMT
Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5EGHJw7021050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:17:19 GMT
Received: from abhmt105.oracle.com (abhmt105.oracle.com [141.146.116.57]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5EGHI0d021033; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:17:18 GMT
Received: from [10.1.21.23] (/10.5.21.23) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:17:18 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C38A856@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:17:16 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BEE20D15-0A3C-46A5-BEFA-68F4A7B70F5C@oracle.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDnjCNXGV0GU7x6gbbZMf4WiEuVvCRY8_Fix5tmdOB-Kg@mail.gmail.com> <AD220324-EEE7-4800-8512-FD7BADA9EC34@oracle.com> <CA+9kkMDY2Z_5_1uYJ1K_ZmrJB2a1-RE7V3aPqNHQg82DyagjCg@mail.gmail.com> <2975A93F-44DA-4020-B4DE-42E7ED98C08F@oracle.com> <51BAC9BC.6070708@ericsson.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C38A856@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] No Interim on SDES at this juncture
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:17:28 -0000

On Jun 14, 2013, at 3:53 AM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>; wrote:

> Also, in general, in order to get most out of meetings (virtual or physical), it is good to have mail discussions. I don't even remember the last time I saw an e-mail on this topic (until it was announced that the meeting won't be held, that is).

Doing a very rough search on my email client, the last time SDES was discussed was waaaaay back on May 10th, in this email:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07460.html
Who can even remember what the Internet was like back then?

But more seriously, we had a LOT of emails about the topic last year.  There was agreement to discuss it in a meeting instead, because the discussion was too difficult for people to follow in email.  So why would people keep discussing it in email?

-hadriel