Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....

Gustavo Garcia <ggb@tokbox.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ggb@tokbox.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A51D1A8A54 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:47:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C0404igaKNY2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5517F1A8A4B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hq12so513986vcb.41 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:46:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rlSJiGK4JCFdKmCN8yRj/7JuCAYn+pX+qD8WQSAH/oM=; b=HKoO7J7DVqbGXx4CIKOUVjTAW6Ca24zzCiT9cKMas3g77jPPj2/lcLEs+3oZoNvdvH tQqOjTnRkEUZDsTyryK41gsDivD+KbH5A8fV2SR3mV8uso0/zh/hHCqI5exTITGM4lpD uvbSpjwHu/BFzg0CLBKBtcuwgXJPGHVoihFzzW6dzrBDutc9l42zI+DlqqItduWKCHmp rL1Lz2yDPEN6OcjwZDb2SEC+2rx2/eqxna60adwb2jF6imZwvOynxGiSsR1/oZB2TTGT c/kmmfkKfCxdPOIgVu0EQwf+skU2zJ7CEhPSFiIeo07s4Mdu27pnD7rUwRCDMgdQVcFQ pTLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnFu5kYzT97ZhD/dk1amp6bI0qcuwALNRNPFFwiJn+vabz764PYSucA2ljzSyf8fErXklUJ
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.165.130 with SMTP id i2mr1765630vcy.7.1418147219499; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:46:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.75.66 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:46:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5487353D.8030106@gmail.com>
References: <5486C48D.8040602@alvestrand.no> <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com> <5487331F.8050404@bbs.darktech.org> <5487353D.8030106@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:46:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPvKHKiZCYZOw3pbOWJOK+v3kB+A=uGwmT_p35jZrm6b_x8-YQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gustavo Garcia <ggb@tokbox.com>
To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158a8ee41fc300509cc2160
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/w09DfNnFIi2nvr3U0okjUuolwIg
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:47:02 -0000

We are planning on implementing both and we are not writing a browser
either.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Sergio Garcia Murillo <
sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 09/12/2014 18:36, cowwoc wrote:
>
>> On 09/12/2014 12:32 PM, David Singer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I would also like to know from those confirming the sense of the room,
>>> whether THEY THEMSELVES intend to implement both codecs, or whether they
>>> conveniently think they don’t need to, and it’s just a problem for other
>>> people to handle.
>>>
>>> Honestly, a +1 for “those other people should do it” is meaningless.
>>>
>>
>> That's a fair point. I'm guessing the vast majority of people answering
>> on the mailing list only plan to implement one codec because they are
>> non-browser implementors.
>>
>
> No, that's not a fair point. I don't see most of the people making taking
> decisions on other topics (SDP, FEC,  DTLS, CC,
> SVC/Simulcasting/Multicasting, Plan A/PlanB/No plan) implementing them
> themselves. So if this going to be the rule about who-can-vote-what we
> should redefine the whole IETF process.
>
> Everyone should be aware of what are they voting and what is the amount of
> burden/costs it requires to be implemented, and see how that will
> contribute to the success/failure of webrtc and vote accordingly. Not just
> in this topic, but in any topic.
>
> Best regards
> Sergio
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>