Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Thu, 21 November 2013 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73761AE0C6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:14:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zgN9kyNFDdxg for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3832D1ADF50 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc-vpn3-1087.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19CC122E1FA; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:14:16 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CAEqTk6RrHSzgJ9QA_spJQWN+6SaRWwwq6H4cwBxNbTHXnHmhYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:14:52 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <827DC810-21FD-494D-9E44-6C7406887464@iii.ca>
References: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com> <CAEqTk6RrHSzgJ9QA_spJQWN+6SaRWwwq6H4cwBxNbTHXnHmhYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Dunkley <peter.dunkley@crocodilertc.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:14:27 -0000

If there are any people in that category that wish to vote, could they email the chairs with full name and affiliation. That would make it easier to figure out how to deal with this issue. I think it will be hard to take votes from someone that will not provide the information required to be on a blue sheet due to questions about double counting. 


On Nov 21, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Peter Dunkley <peter.dunkley@crocodilertc.net>; wrote:

> 
> On 21 November 2013 08:51, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>; wrote:
> 
> 2) Establish those eligible to vote.  Any participant in the
> working group process either electronically or in-person as of yesterday
> (20th of November). Who has participated in the Working group process
> will be anyone that can be identified from:
>  - The Blue Sheets for any RTCWEB WG session during an IETF meeting or
>    an interim meeting since the WG's creation.
>  - posting of at least one email to the RTCWEB mailing list
> 
> The voter must at time of voting prove their eligibility, by pointing to
> the mail archive or a particular blue sheet/meeting. Please verify your
> own eligibility.
> 
> 
> 
> What about those who are not on the blue sheets because we participated (and at the last meeting voted/hummed on this issue) through Jabber?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb