IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Mon, 07 July 2014 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0241B280F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 03:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uy6XGZec81z8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 03:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com (mail-qg0-f43.google.com [209.85.192.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2289C1B280C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 03:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z60so3483290qgd.16 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 03:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kgxO9+ZCiaV5rxRTCI5NHxkoI8D2jkltPR49fmA2rJs=; b=OPr95YGtVIR9elebkSW85tyX5TcdGFIyyE8nzb2KVs9yHgrSp/i60S5sUX54JB43Nt 5Hnu7NKtJ+VK4C1CTRzi47QfScJ/r2QTtssIJ3AtvPgBgAlGRMfXL7UdspWjVuqKiRPW htOfbut2O2zDk6hheNgGXyjkCDlTHwN2P9c74t5TN5FVu/NwuUwYyMmS/jxl3Xbx2gZP CWMCyGcv9/7aRwpoVYUtMvCkQy4wkUuSuZc76Mz66AnD2q/NdG5ZLUjqIQzfQSJTgQoP vtiQZeaT/dG2sVbotLpbX5OFThKP90I11WikeXdIQ+Tza1bCRBz9ZvjX7uFLzRntjr4W N/WQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQneNtNDmcspk2WbKJSB+n4cIgbQ1gLY6u/FRH0Vnot0Y5NhIEzL8DLy6x6XGiqZbz9lLCz9
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.162.212 with SMTP id w20mr46745575qax.50.1404729669389; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 03:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.234.131 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 03:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.234.131 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 03:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140707123422.4176cc3d@lminiero>
References: <CALiegf=kLtiUKoue=ahXP4fUhLJNNd8vCaQTECQxjK5R7cjLTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv8s5-FNR-kq0C01H_Ev39cyBs5P__Pd-0cmCXDFYy-YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPV_iVcSmi+ndDaYY6zX=F7TRoSDFqe5hzJP3-NjZ7Y1w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=CMAOwVF3=gNY9qrsTfsEwuiwvGZ_1SaS0waOUE83-Ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMPyT4y1v12O5pb7Khs2ge0pgjUugrBS0NoK8=SLOScxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmjywprsFvsQg10S0nGw08XhuCAjDrqgx2=ZfV-T6_PVA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBM+ywkbXbE6=fz7Z9kmZkpsqW385kntoXW2RAR1eaWu1A@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=_6je5kqwPETMGmU+tznypJLEnTdvMa2+i5Nae=t9vTA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D3B608F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfk5XMO6ShgugD3tXNx=Z2CN-R8NwCDJF9DTgq+V8j8Yig@mail.gmail.com> <20140707123422.4176cc3d@lminiero>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:41:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfntsesN3SgA7LuEZqymE+piKrSj4e-Q+QwXhhEAwgpKXA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013cb7cef3242a04fd981c08"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/w8z4wSygO8Uai_F2UM-ziFqgiF0
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:41:11 -0000

> I agree that ICE-Lite should be supported. We've used the
> backwards-compatibility card for so many things in RTCWEB so far that it
> seems silly to throw away what on the other end would be really useful.

BTW I do not consider ICE Lite something for "backwards-compatibility", but
an easier way to implement real ICE in servers running in the public
Internet in which all the complexity of full ICE is not required at all.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email